I didn’t like the M30, 30.1 and 30.2 as the sound is too dark in the
treble. The sound is slightly restrained and closed-in to give it the
monitor quality where it excels in jazz and small ensembles. Play some
dynamic music and you can sense something is amiss. Music doesn’t have
the air as if it is held back. This is the trait of the Monitor series
with Harbeth.
Try the Super HL5 Plus. I find this speaker to be more balanced in presentation than any of the M30.1 or 30.2 iterations. The midrange is almost the same and the biggest difference is the Super HL5 Plus sounds much more open especially in the treble. You can hear the decay of notes linger in the air unlike the notes being cut short with the M30.1. Also, the bass of the Super HL5 Plus goes deeper as you get more slam and texture in the bass.
In summary, I find the M30.1 to sound too warm and shut-in, lacking the air and dynamics of the Super HL5 Plus. Nevertheless, if you like a warm and intimate sound, the sound of a small jazz club and ensemble performing in the front row live, the M30.1 will work out better.
For a wider music genre which include pop, rock and jazz fusion, the Super HL5 Plus is a better choice.
Try the Super HL5 Plus. I find this speaker to be more balanced in presentation than any of the M30.1 or 30.2 iterations. The midrange is almost the same and the biggest difference is the Super HL5 Plus sounds much more open especially in the treble. You can hear the decay of notes linger in the air unlike the notes being cut short with the M30.1. Also, the bass of the Super HL5 Plus goes deeper as you get more slam and texture in the bass.
In summary, I find the M30.1 to sound too warm and shut-in, lacking the air and dynamics of the Super HL5 Plus. Nevertheless, if you like a warm and intimate sound, the sound of a small jazz club and ensemble performing in the front row live, the M30.1 will work out better.
For a wider music genre which include pop, rock and jazz fusion, the Super HL5 Plus is a better choice.