Pathos Classic One MKiII vs. my separates

Thanks dill! Your input is truly appreciated. Based on online research conducted I thought this might be a good integrated as a replacement. 

Well, I just struck a deal with the seller of the Pathos. Looking forward to hearing it. Will post my thoughts. 

Dill and rudge, thanks for the comments. I will get back to you regarding my thoughts once I have listened to this amp. 

The Pathos arrives safely and in great working order. I haven't yet listened to it enough to determine it's character referenced against my separates.  Will get back to all once I am more familiar. 

Any suggestions for tube rolling?

Just wanted to get back to say how much I enjoy the Pathos II. Very smooth sounding, solid bass, and great soundstage. May entertain the purchase of another to mono the pair. Not sure the need, since system is in a 12 x 15 x 8 foot room.  Near field listening.  

Thanks rudge. I am not in any hurry to change anything in my system until I sell the separate pre and amp. 

I would not describe my Pathos as 'Digital' bright. 

I still own the Jolida preamp and BEL 1001 amp. Couldn't part with the BEL. Use the Pathos in a second system, though could have easily remained in the primary.

Hifioutlaw, I am not familiar with the Boenickes. I believe results from using two Pathos Model ones in bridged mode would be dependent on the reasons the Boenickes are power hungry, sensitivity or impedance. The Pathos are rated at 70wpc into 8ohms and 130 into 4 ohms. As I understand it, bridging works best when watts are needed, due to low sensitivity, however if low impedance is at play then current is important. It has been explained that current delivery is reduced in a bridged amplifier. Others may explain this better.

I still have the Pathos, can't seem to part with it, smooth non analytical sound, great looks.