2. amps-preamps
  3. 135668-96386

Passive bi-amped Classe Amp5 vs 2300

Hi all,

Would a passive bi-amped Classe Sigma Amp5 be comparable in sound quality and power, to a Ca-2300 (or Ct-2300 for that matter) for stereo purposes?

My speakers are B&W Nautilus 802 r/l and Htm1 for the center and some Polk Audios for the surrounds. I already own an Amp2 and a CAV-180 that are both nice; but I thought the 500W 802s could use an amp upgrade. My pre/pro is a SSP-300 and I am happy with it.

Another -a little more expensive- option would be a Ca (or Ct) 5300.

All options are second hand apart from the Amp5.

I will appreciate any input, as I don't have the option of demoing anything!
kislali

Showing 2 responses by ron17

ron17
607 posts
 
Hi Kislali,

I own a Amp5 and a CA 5100.  IMO the Amp5 is a home theater amp only!  The CA 5100 is way better (musically speaking).  If you could swing a CA 2300 I think you would be very happy....even a CA 5200 or CA 5300 would be light years ahead of your Amp5 and Amp2.  I'm sure you know Classe and B&W mate extremely well together.  Keep your Amp5 for HT duties and upgrade to the CA series.
ron17
607 posts
 
I would make my decision based on listening preferences.  It sounds like your system is a stereo/HT set-up (like mine).  If you listen 75% to 2 channel music and 25% HT I would opt for a CA or CT-2300 for the front L&R speakers and use the Amp5 for center and surrounds.  If you are more 50/50 stereo/HT I would go for a CA or CT-5300.  The 2300 will sound a little better for 2 channel stereo music and offer the ability to bi-wire but the  5300 is a really good amp for both (if space is an issue).  There is a CA-5300 and a CT-2300 on Agon right now for sell.
More to discover