Parasound vs Rotel Amps


I have already searched for this but the threads are pretty old. I have long been a huge fan of the Parasound Halo series. I owned a few A51, A52, and recently had tried their "New Classic" line. However, I feel Parasound has NOT updated their technology for a long time. The Halo is pretty much still what John Curl has originally designed. Also their pre-amps are also lagging behind, unlike Rotel which already has the latest Dolby ATMOS and DTS:X.  

Therefore, Rotel has always been my choice for the Pre. I had the RSP 1570, and now the latest RSP-1576. So what's everyone's view on rotel Amps? Do they sound as good the Halo? My choice is either a new Rotel or continue with my Halo. I've looked at many manufactures and it seems like Rotel has the best warranty (5 years). 

I have ML eletrostats for the front an dynaudio audience 42 for all the surrounds. 

Thanks.
angelgz2

Showing 2 responses by gp4jesus

Well coming to this party LATE...

Parasound versus Rotel? I own, compared, and still use some vintage stuff. Namely Rotel 900 series - 980BX & 981 compared them to Parasound’s HCA-1000/1000 collectively tri-amping towers. 

The P’sound were great for driving unmodified Polk RTi A series speakers as their mid & top are a bit forward & bright. 

My RTi A series are bi & tri amped - yes no passive filtering save for Clarity DC blocking caps on the tweeters.  To me the P’sound sounded “flat” & the top rolled off. During one energetic listening session, I saw the P 1000 “Overload” LED flash driving 4 ohm tweeters. 

Rotels make the speakers disappear. They idle & run cooler and even during very  demanding program material I’ve thrown at them, they don’t seem to break a sweat. 
My $0.02. Thanks. Tony