Own many mid-game speakers or a few end-game speakers.


After I got hooked into this hobby I started to have a small collection of speakers each in the $5k-$10k ranges that have various tonal quality and unique characters from each other. It doesn’t feel one speaker is absolutely better than another and they all have their own personalities, and I quite enjoy these diversity for different type of music I listen to (or hearing the same music expressed very differently which is always fun) and I’m always tempted to add more, for example, I recently get excited about Klipsch and want to try their horns which I do not have had any experience of.

But, these things quickly add up and could become endless pursuit, especially consider speakers differ not just in response curves but also in dynamic, decay, sound stage and details that are all hard to emulate with software. I’m trying to limit the max spending I have on speakers. I’m wondering what’s the perspective of upgrading v.s. buying into more diversity in this game. A few questions I have for you is, say you have $60k in budget on speakers new/used and you have infinite rooms (no amp/source), how would you allocate it (from buying 5000 Homepod Minis to one B&W nautilus) and why?
bwang29

Showing 1 response by kingharold

I agree with Miller Carbon and others.  I want to spend time listening to the very best speakers I can find and afford and not to a bunch of second bests.

Audioguy85 wrote, "I'll keep my tannoys made in Scottland UK over any home built abomination." 

Audioguy85, that sounds as though you feel all DIY speakers are home built abominations.  I respectfully wish to disagree.  My fully horn loaded, triamplified, DEQX controlled DIY speakers sound damned fine.  I suspect that you've never heard excellent DIY speakers.