Showing 5 responses by three_easy_payments

I shall not today attempt further to define the kinds of material I understand to be embraced within that shorthand description ["hard-core pornography"], and perhaps I could never succeed in intelligibly doing so. But I know it when I see it, and the motion picture involved in this case is not that.

1964 - Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart

If this is child pornography that's a criminal charge.  Have the legal authorities made an arrest?
The emotional damage is he identifies as she making the cover a painful reminder of societies oppression of trans yada yada whatever.

The irony isn’t lost on me - a guy who complains out of one side of his mouth about being so hurt over name-calling while the other side of the mouth belittles the entire global population who identify as non-binary or another gender. Prejudice has no place on these forums and I’m shocked the moderators feel no need to purge such content. How in any universe can this comment be construed as anything but non-relevant blather that is intended to deploy hate?