2. digital
  3. 172704-1665

Next best exponential DAC quality level?

I recently did a shoot out of three DACs using my Hint6 + routing each of the other DACs to analog input on the Hint6:

(1) Hint6: ESS Sabre32 -- Integrated 

(2) SMSL M500: ES9038PRO D/A   ~$400 

(3) Khadas ToneBoard(v1): ESS ES9038Q2M - ~$99

I played the same song passages on Amazon Music and was able to cycle through each Hint6 input corresponding to each DAC.

The result?  Very small difference in terms of rendering.  Maybe a more open sound stage with better overall balance using the Hint6 DAC.  The Khadas was more bass / midrange pronounced w/ a more narrow soundstage.  However, I wouldn't suggest that any were head-and-shoulders "better" over the others.  In fact, they were all pretty decent with only small nuances (certainly not worth the price differences.   

I decided to keep the Khadas for my small headphone listening area. 

But it got me thinking - how much would one have to spend to realize an exponential difference in quality?  Is the Khadas that good, or is DAC technology differences more nuanced than I originally thought (meaning, we're paying 10x for only 5% better).  

 

martinman

Showing 1 response by tk21

tk21
238 posts
 

Devices using the ES9038PRO chip include the ~$99 Khadas tone board, the ~$14,000 Lumin X1, and many others at price points all over the map. Same DAC chip (or different versions of the same DAC chip) with many different implementations and collateral features. What do you get for nearly $14K with the Lumin X1? The same DAC chip but 2 of them (one per channel); more sophisticated LEEDH volume control; optical fiber network input (in addition to RJ45 ethernet); a separate linear power supply; solid billet CNC casing. But no Toslink, Coax, or USB inputs. I think you have to pay extra for an IR remote.

FWIW, at least one device with that chip ranks near the top of the Audio Science Review comparisons. I have one of them, which cost me about $3K. I suspect the Lumin X1 might produce a noticeably bigger sound stage and maybe more precise/holographic imaging. In somebody’s listening room, to somebody’s ears, but not necessarily mine.

More to discover