New PrimaLuna versus used Audio Research preamp?

As posted previously, I'm shopping tube preamps.

Have an opportunity to buy a friend's ARC Reference 5SE, as he upgraded to a new 6SE.

Alternatively, a new PL EVO 300 or 400 is also on my radar, and even new would cost 20% to 30% less than the used 5SE.

Anyone here experience both units and brands?

Thanks!

bobbydd06-18-2022 6:18pm

charles1dad Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 10,236 posts 06-23-2022 at 08:51am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete “the LS series is sterile and SS-like.” This is why many make the distinction between the LS and Reference series of ARC line stages. They aren’t one and the same.
charles1dad Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 10,236 posts 06-19-2022 at 02:25pm Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete @bobbydd I looked at your posted audio system and it is very nice. I am quite familiar with the ARC Reference 2 MK II and the Reference 5SE is a considerable improvement in my opinion. I have read very good comments/reviews in regard to the PL EVO 400 preamp (But I have not heard it). Given the components in your current system, the REF 5SE seems the better fit. Charles
charles1dad Details Discussions Posts This discussion Message User 10,236 posts 06-19-2022 at 01:34am Copy Comment URL Report Comment Edit Delete Since opinions are being solicited, here’s mine. I believe that the used ARC Reference 5 SE is the better sounding and higher quality line stage. In the long term I feel it will prove to be more satisfying and something you can build an audio system around as a foundational component. Charles