Neal Young and Tidal


I read where Neal Young claimed the MQA files of his music on Tidal were not his Master recordings. Isn’t that what MQA stands for: Master Quality Authenticated. If that’s what happened, then is MQA not really a guarantee that you are getting THE Master recording? Maybe I didn’t get the story right.  Because if that’s true I would think the story would be covered in every audio publication with MQA being named the biggest hoax in years. But that isn’t happening. What’s the real story? 
vinylfan62

Showing 1 response by ejr1953

I have an SACD setup and most of the Super Audio disks DO sound better than my CD versions...but not all of them.  A few of the SACDs I have purchased from legitimate sources sound a bit "dull" compared to the CD versions.  I suspect that these were not "mastered" from the mix tapes to SACD, that they might have taken the 44.1/16 PCM off the CD and "up converted" it to DSD, losing some sound quality in the process.

Back when I had Tidal, much of the rock and jazz I listened to did seem to have more bass and more "presence", but much of the classical to me sounded "dull" or "artificial".  I wonder if some of the MQA content is taken from 44.1/16 PCM and "up converted" like the SACDs I described above.

I don't know if the MQA files have or have not been "remastered".  I suspect that not all of them have been, just in the sheer numbers that have been made available as MQA.