NAS/Streamer or server/player?


Recently my server/player died due to a major power issue to my house. So now I am considering whether to use another music server/player or spend the same $ (say ~USD$8-10k) on a player/streamer only and link to a dedicated Synology NAS that I have spare (but with a low end processor and HDDs).

I use a Chord Dave as pre amp/DAC direct to a Vitus RS-101. I use Roon.

What thoughts do you guys have on the what option and equipment will give the best SQ outcome and why?

Thanks in advance for the help.

kamphu

Showing 1 response by verdantaudio

The difference here is in how the devices handle their jobs.  The digital front end needs to do a few things.  It needs to access your local files, deal with a very volatile internet and the decompress/unfold your files as it serves data to the DAC.  

The first step managing files and dealing with the internet is very processor intensive.  This is where a server really excels.  

The rendering (decompression/unfold) is far less processor intensive and many manufacturers argue that to much power here introduces noise.  

All of this has to be clocked and synchronized with the clock in the DAC.  

Given these points above, I fall firmly in the server/player camp.  I don't love the pure streamer approach nor do I like a single computer/server approach though I feel a single server outperforms a single streamer, especially at the high end.  

I like splitting things into different parts.  This is what Antipodes does in their higher end servers.  The K30 and K50 have two computers, one that is higher powered than the other.  Another approach is to get a single server (Roon Nucleus, Antipodes S40, Antipodes K41, etc...) and pair it with a Roon Endpoint like a Bricasti M5 or Weiss DSP 501/502.