Misskuma,
I think it was a Hovland HP 200 feeding into a Hovland amp and then into Sonus Faber Anniversario speakers. The Hovland gear is reasonable smooth and full bodied, but, a touch polite and dynamically constrained. I have no idea which player this setup favors. The differences between the units were small enough that favoring one over the other could be easily attributable to system synergy.
I heard the CD555 in a lot of different systems before I purchased one myself. It sounded good in all instances, but then again, one could expect such systems to be pretty good. To me, the only substantial sonic issue with the Naim is that it retains some of that artificial "edgy" quality to the initial attack of notes that makes it sound just a touch mechanical (i.e., "transistor sound"); not as severe as with other Naim players, but still there. For absence of that kind of artifact, I like the Audionote DACs, particularly the DAC-5 signature.
I think it was a Hovland HP 200 feeding into a Hovland amp and then into Sonus Faber Anniversario speakers. The Hovland gear is reasonable smooth and full bodied, but, a touch polite and dynamically constrained. I have no idea which player this setup favors. The differences between the units were small enough that favoring one over the other could be easily attributable to system synergy.
I heard the CD555 in a lot of different systems before I purchased one myself. It sounded good in all instances, but then again, one could expect such systems to be pretty good. To me, the only substantial sonic issue with the Naim is that it retains some of that artificial "edgy" quality to the initial attack of notes that makes it sound just a touch mechanical (i.e., "transistor sound"); not as severe as with other Naim players, but still there. For absence of that kind of artifact, I like the Audionote DACs, particularly the DAC-5 signature.