NAD C275BEE break in period?


Anyone have any experience with a NAD C275BEE power amplifier? Wondering what the break in period is and what changes was noticed.
deanshias
Receiver vs separate Amp = added *i/c.
Enough to account for the differences you are hearing.
Give the unit (and i/c) some time to settle~couple days.
Then can play around a bit *there to achieve the balance you looking for.


I've been doing 2 sessions a day of 4 hours+ when possible.  You don't need high volume levels.

I had the C375BEE, BTW, and it clashed with my Totem Acoustic Rainmakers.  There was little in the way of a sweet midrange, at least in my case.  These NAD amps have a different approach that sees no increase in power going from 8 to 4 ohms, and I always wondered if that was why it sounded off with the 4 ohm Rainmakers.

Arcam is definitely in another class.
Thanks for the responses.. whats a proper way to break it in? At the moment I just leave it on with an average if 3 listening hours a day. It is preamped out from my Arcam AVR400 receiver.. the sound is definitely more bold and effortless.. but missing the sweet fluid midrange that the arcam has.. wondering if that gap will get filled over time.
Tin ear got the first post. Golden ear gets the one that counts.

Don’t need experience with your particular amp. Which you will understand after you do this enough, because they all go through pretty much the same process. Right out of the box the whatever it is will sound pretty much like what its ultimately going to sound like. Similar enough a lot of tin ears never notice the slow gradual changes that happen during the first 50 hours or so of use.

Early cold right out of the box sound is going to be thin, grainy, and harsh or aggressive. Then over time the grainy edges become less. If the component is really good the edges become less but not because they are smoothed over but in a way that you hear even more detail, just in a more natural and effortless way.

If you listen closely you should be able to hear that these changes are greater and faster early on, and become more fine and fewer as the hours go by. Like Bob Ross painting a scene. The colors and shapes, the scene doesn’t change but the details keep filling in until at the end it looks pretty good.

Some people, especially some dealers, use this as an excuse. "My Binford Symphonic Bombast 2000 requires 2000 hours of break-in! Its that good!" Liar. If its any good at all then it will sound good right out of the box. Yes it will also continue to sound better with time. But if its not good from the beginning send it back, it never will be. You just might get used to it is all.

If you are unsure what if anything you are hearing there is a simple exercise to move your ears from tin to golden. The type of sound that comes with burn-in is almost exactly the same as happens every time a stone cold component is first turned on. So simply leave your component on 24/7 for a while. Long enough to get good and used to that thoroughly warmed up sound. Then turn it off and the next night turn it on and listen right away. No warm-up. That same thin grainy aggressive sound will be there. Maybe even enough for tin ear to hear.





Not sure about that.  Totem Acoustics, for example, recommends 100 hours or more of easy going on many of their speakers to break them in.

I tried turning up a sub of theirs that I acquired, and it started making mechanical noises.  After break in, it was fine.
I do own several older NAD components: an integrated amp, a preamp and a preamp/tuner. Excellent affordable products. 
Once any electronic device reaches its operating temperature it is good to go! That may take 20 minutes or several hours! The idea that an electronic device sounds "better" over extended time (days, weeks, months) is totally erroneous - contrary to what the "golden ear" crowd claims! Spoken as a longtime owner/user of many electronic components, both tube and SS.