My Long List of Amplifiers and My Personal Review of Each!


So I have been in a long journey looking to find the best amplifiers for my martin logan montis. As you know, the match between an amplifier and speakers has to be a good "marriage" and needs to be blend exquisitely. Right now, I think I might have found the best sounding amplifier for martin logan. I have gone through approximately 34-36 amplifiers in the past 12 months. Some of these are:

Bryston ST, SST, SST2 series
NAD M25
PARASOUND HALO
PARASOUND CLASSIC
KRELL TAS
KRELL KAV 500
KRELL CHORUS
ROTEL RMB 1095
CLASSE CT 5300
CLASSE CA 2200
CLASSE CA 5200
MCINTOSH MC 205
CARY AUDIO CINEMA 7
OUTLAW AUDIO 755
LEXICON RX7
PASS LABS XA 30.8
BUTLER AUDIO 5150
ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005

With all that said, the amplifiers I mentioned above are the ones that in my opinion are worth mentioning. To make a long story short, there is NO 5 CHANNEL POWER AMP that sounds as good as a 3ch and 2ch amplifier combination. i have done both experiments and the truth is that YOU DO lose details and more channel separation,etc when you select a 5 channel power amplifier of any manufacturer.
My recollection of what each amp sounded like is as follows:

ATI SIGNATURE SERIES 6005 (great power and amazing soundstage. Very low noise floor, BUT this amplifiers NEEDS TO BE cranked up in order to fully enjoy it. If you like listening at low volume levels or somewhat moderate, you are wasting your time here. This amp won’t sound any different than many other brands out there at this volume. The bass is great, good highs although they are a bit bright for my taste)

NAD M25 (very smooth, powerful, but somewhat thin sounding as far as bass goes)
Bryston sst2(detailed, good soundstage, good power, but can be a little forward with certain speakers which could make them ear fatiguing at loud volumes)

Krell (fast sounding, nice bass attack, nice highs, but some detail does get lost with certain speakers)

rotel (good amp for the money, but too bright in my opinion)

cary audio (good sound overall, very musical, but it didn’t have enough oomph)

parasound halo (good detail, great bass, but it still holds back some background detail that i can hear in others)

lexicon (very laid back and smooth. huge power, but if you like more detail or crisper highs, this amp will disappoint you)

McIntosh mc205 (probably the worst multichannel amp given its price point. it was too thin sounding, had detail but lacked bass.

butler audio (good amplifier. very warm and smooth sweet sounding. i think for the money, this is a better amp than the parasound a51)

pass labs (very VERY musical with excellent bass control. You can listen to this for hours and hours without getting ear fatigue. however, it DOES NOT do well in home theater applications if all you have is a 2 channel set up for movies. The midrange gets somewhat "muddy" or very weak sounding that you find yourself trying to turn it up.

classe audio (best amplifier for multi channel applications. i simply COULDNT FIND a better multi channel amplifier PERIOD. IT has amazing smoothness, amazing power and good bass control although i would say krell has much better bass control)

Update: The reviews above were done in January 2015. Below is my newest update as of October 2016:



PS AUDIO BHK 300 MONOBLOCKS: Amazing amps. Tons of detail and really amazing midrange. the bass is amazing too, but the one thing i will say is that those of you with speakers efficiency of 87db and below you will not have all the "loudness" that you may want from time to time. These amps go into protection mode when using a speaker such as the Salon, but only at very loud levels. Maybe 97db and above. If you don’t listen to extreme crazy levels, these amps will please you in every way.

Plinius Odeon 7 channel amp: This is THE BEST multichannel amp i have ever owned. Far , but FAR SUPERIOR to any other multichannel amp i have owned. In my opinion it destroyed all of the multichannel amps i mentioned above and below. The Odeon is an amp that is in a different tier group and it is in a league of its own. Amazing bass, treble and it made my center channel sound more articulate than ever before. The voices where never scrambled with the action scenes. It just separated everything very nicely.

Theta Dreadnaught D: Good detailed amp. Looks very elegant, has a pleasant sound, but i found it a tad too bright for my taste. I thought it was also somewhat "thin" sounding lacking body to the music. could be that it is because it is class d?

Krell Duo 300: Good amp. Nice and detailed with enough power to handle most speakers out there. I found that it does have a very nice "3d" sound through my electrostatics. Nothing to fault here on this amp.
Mark Levinson 532H: Great 2 channel amp. Lots of detail, amazing midrange which is what Mark Levinson is known for. It sounds very holographic and will please those of you looking for more detail and a better midrange. As far as bass, it is there, but it is not going to give you the slam of a pass labs 350.5 or JC1s for example. It is great for those that appreciate classical music, instrumental, etc, but not those of you who love tons of deep bass.

 It is articulate sounding too
Krell 7200: Plenty of detail and enough power for most people. i found that my rear speakers contained more information after installed this amp. One thing that i hated is that you must use xlr cables with this amp or else you lose most of its sound performance when using RCA’s.

Krell 402e: Great amp. Very powerful and will handle any speaker you wish. Power is incredible and with great detail. That said, i didn’t get all the bass that most reviewers mentioned. I thought it was "ok" in regards to bass. It was there, but it didn’t slam me to my listening chair.

Bryston 4B3: Good amp with a complete sound. I think this amp is more laid back than the SST2 version. I think those of you who found the SST2 version of this amp a little too forward with your speakers will definitely benefit from this amp’s warmth. Bryston has gone towards the "warm" side in my opinion with their new SST3 series. As always, they are built like tanks. I wouldn’t call this amp tube-like, but rather closer to what the classe audio delta 2 series sound like which is on the warm side of things.

Parasound JC1s: Good powerful amps. Amazing low end punch (far superior bass than the 402e). This amp is the amp that i consider complete from top to bottom in regards to sound. Nothing is lacking other than perhaps a nicer chassis. Parasound needs to rework their external appearance when they introduce new amps. This amp would sell much more if it had a revised external appearance because the sound is a great bang for the money. It made my 800 Nautilus scream and slam. Again, amazing low end punch.

Simaudio W7: Good detailed amp. This amp reminds me a lot of the Mark Levinson 532h. Great detail and very articulate. I think this amp will go well with bookshelves that are ported in order to compensate for what it lacks when it comes to the bass. That doesn’t mean it has no bass, but when it is no Parasound JC1 either.
Pass labs 350.5: Wow, where do i begin? maybe my first time around with the xa30.8 wasn’t as special as it was with this monster 350.5. It is just SPECTACULAR sounding with my electrostatics. The bass was THE BEST BASS i have ever heard from ANY amp period. The only amp that comes close would be the jC1s. It made me check my settings to make sure the bass was not boosted and kept making my jaw drop each time i heard it. It totally destroyed the krell 402e in every regard. The krell sounded too "flat" when compared to this amp. This amp had amazing mirange with great detail up top. In my opinion, this amp is the best bang for the money. i loved this amp so much that i ended up buying the amp that follows below.

Pass labs 250.8: What can i say here. This is THE BEST STEREO AMP i have ever heard. This amp destroys all the amps i have listed above today to include the pass labs 350.5. It is a refined 350.5 amp. It has more 3d sound which is something the 350.5 lacked. It has a level of detail that i really have never experienced before and the bass was amazing as well. I really thought it was the most complete power amplifier i have ever heard HANDS DOWN. To me, this is a benchmark of an amplifier. This is the amp that others should be judged by. NOTHING is lacking and right now it is the #1 amplifier that i have ever owned.

My current amps are Mcintosh MC601s: i decided to give these 601s a try and they don’t disappoint. They have great detail, HUGE soundstage, MASSIVE power and great midrange/highs. The bass is great, but it is no pass labs 250.8 or 350.5. As far as looks, these are the best looking amps i have ever owned. No contest there. i gotta be honest with you all, i never bought mcintosh monos before because i wasn’t really "wowed" by the mc452, but it could have been also because at that time i was using a processor as a preamp which i no longer do. Today, i own the Mcintosh C1100 2 chassis tube preamp which sounds unbelievable. All the amps i just described above have been amps that i auditioned with the C1100 as a preamp. The MC601s sound great without a doubt, but i will say that if you are looking for THE BEST sound for the money, these would not be it. However, Mcintosh remains UNMATCHED when it comes to looks and also resale value. Every other amp above depreciates much faster than Mcintosh.

That said, my future purchase (when i can find a steal of a deal) will be the Pass labs 350.8. I am tempted to make a preliminary statement which is that i feel this amp could be THE BEST stereo amp under 30k dollars. Again, i will be able to say more and confirm once i own it. I hope this update can help you all in your buying decisions!


jays_audio_lab

Showing 50 responses by mayoradamwest

Related to the debate earlier, my new Alexia 2s arrive in just 2 weeks! Glad you are trying out the DAW. I heard them in the same room and much much preferred the Alexia 2, but it was a big room. 
Audio Research Ref 6 can now be had for half the price of the 6SE and is astonishingly good. I recall you having one so that’s my guess. 
@viber6 I play in orchestras, and it's true that there is no comparison between a recording and the being *inside* a live orchestra. The sound in the audience is much duller. You're right to find the closest possible seat, preferably in the middle, but there is not a huge difference side to side - you'll get a difference balance, but it'll still sound wonderful. I've never heard a recording that captured the sound from within the orchestra properly. For those of you obsesses with old recordings of orchestras, it's just so far from reality I don't know what to say. The closest are some of the recent recordings of Chicago, Philly, and Boston. I'll also give a nod to the recent Mahler 9 by Los Angeles. But even these high quality recordings still don't quite capture it.
Fun fact. This thread accounts for nearly 10% of all posts in the amps/preamps sub-forum. There are 4 sub-forums with fewer posts than this one thread. Nice going @whitecamaross !
@viber6 I play trumpet in the SF Bay area and have played with most of the pro orchestras around here. The trouble with recordings pre-80s more than anything else is that winds and brass completely changed their style of playing in the US. It went from short and bright, to darker and more legato. With the strings a big change occurred as well with a bigger focus on intonation and less vibrato in auditions. Perhaps my favorite recording of the past 20 years in the CSO doing Mahler 3, released in 2007. I've never heard the opening horns (all 12 of them) sound so good. That said, it's nothing like in person. I had a chance to see Philly do Shostakovich 7 a few years ago and it was breathtaking. I don't particularly like Boston, but the recent release of Shostakovich 4 is also wonderful. These are getting much closer to the sound of the orchestra. As a brass player, I have a lot of time to sit around and listen.
I think it’s unfortunate that @whitecamaross thinks it’s his fault that the thread lost steam and not the person who has been posting 3x more than anyone else with 12 page long lectures. 

To be direct, I have loved reading the feedback of @whitecamaross  but  @viber6 has unfortunately made it a bit of a chore to continue reading and thus I have missed several updates. Like, what happened to the 2301? Whatever happened to getting a Pass 350.8? 
WC I’m considering the M900u. Based on your experience, how much does it give up to the big guys you are using now? Was considering running it as stereo. Seems like a great deal getting a 15k amp that can match 30k amps.  Currently using a McIntosh MC452 fed by a ARC Ref 6. Thanks!
Much appreciated! Love this thread and keep it going. I’m a fan of home theater as well and can’t wait to see how you marry the two. Using a Marantz 7703 processor now and your review of the Mcintosh gets me thinking ... :)
I’ve heard the Focal and Wilson, and personally I’d take the Focal by a mile. In particular the Wilson sounded analytical and lacked bass. 
@whitecamaross did you ever try any of the newer Boulder amps like the 2160? I know you didn’t love the earlier generations but was curious how it compared. 
@whitecamaross I am curious, and you may have said it in one of the earlier 156 pages, but do you have some goto reference music you are using? I'm just trying to understand the types of music you like, as I suspect that affects which equipment you prefer. Those Focals are certainly wonderful. I've heard the bigger brother, the Stella Utopia EM Evo (So many variants), and was impressed for sure.
Are we guessing? I’ll vote for a Luxman tube setup. Or back to McIntosh that you loved so much before. 
I am very happy with the 508 but I don’t think WC uses a TT. My plan is both a dCS Rossini and a new amp. I do wish WC would try a newer Boulder amp, but I plan auditioning the 160S as well. Very much anticipating interesting results on WCs new comparison 
Will you be trying the Reference 6 with the Merrill amp? I wonder if that’s a middle ground that would sweeten up the Merrill just a little and maybe even add a little extra sound stage?
This is a wonderful comparison, thanks for such a detailed account! I find the last example a little unusual with the restaurant. From reading the above, I would have thought the Ref 6 was more like going to a restaurant where they maybe use a little extra MSG to make everything taste better, but the Merrill allows you to taste the subtlety of all the dishes, at the risk that sometimes the dish won’t be very good.

From these descriptions, I think I’d prefer a setup where all my favorite music still sounds great, but still is plenty revealing. Which sounds like the Ref 6? I don’t want the setup to dictate the music I like.
@rsf507 based on my own experience (I also have a well broken in Ref 6) and the many many reviews, I suspect we’re splitting hairs here. I’m not sure that many people grow tired of the Ref 6 sound, but do appreciate that everyone has different tastes, completely different setups, and in different spaces. 
I wonder if the difference here is just SS vs Tube? I’m also imagining the Ref 6 isn’t fully broken in yet? For instance, would another top tier SS sound even better? Something from Ayre, Pass, or D’Ag?
@whitecamaross  as an owner of a Ref 6 as well I was wondering if it was up to the task of getting the most out of such an amp. The preamp on paper (money) isn’t in the same class as the Pass XS300 but I had a suspicion that it performs well above its price class. Thoughts on this? I was thinking about getting an amp in the same class (Boulder 2160 at $53k) but was told the Ref 6 might not be up to the task. Thoughts? 
Where are you finding these components usually? I didn’t see the XS300 listed on Audiogon. Any Boulder items, for instance, are extremely rare to find used in the US. I’ll be replacing my Ref 6 with a Boulder 1110 soon, but definitely won’t find a used one. 
How is any of this, including Viber6’s diatribe, related to the thread? I want to hear more about the preamps and how everything is breaking in. Any more thoughts on cables and how are the speakers sounding. 
Internet rules clearly state everyone must be corrected. 
So excited to hear thoughts on the Boulder. I likely have a 2110 coming soon to pair with a 1160 power amp. I’ve been impressed so far, and their support is top notch. 
I think like any systems, there needs to be synergy. Everyone I’ve met who has heard the Boulder 3060 has been quite impressed. Their preamps are also remarkably revealing in a good way. It really may come down to what music you like and what the rest of the system is. That said, the XS300 I’m sure is equally as amazing in different ways. 
I could be mistaken but each time you’ve compared the Ref 6 with something, you’ve always said it had a wider soundstage. It seems like a lot of audiophiles value this above most other things. I’ve got a 2110 incoming and have a Ref 6. I’m really curious to see if I hear the same thing in my setup, with the soundstage. 
Heard the Alexias with a Boulder 1160 amp and 1110 preamp (dCS Vivaldi DAC). Sound was incredible. I had previously heard the DAW and Spectral in the same space and was unimpressed. Wilson with Boulder was amazing. Transparent cabling. 
Not that the Benchmark is bad - I’m sure it’s excellent - but what’s the point of recommending it here? Do you really expect he’ll replace the Boulder, Pass, or Audio Research with it, or are you saying it to get a rise out of people?
That’s tough. The Vivaldi is astonishingly good. I just heard it on the Alexia series 2 with the Boulder amp and preamp and it was incredible. I’ve got the Rossini, so maybe I’m partial, but I’d vote the Vivaldi. 
Fwiw; on the Vivaldi, I think they assume you’ll get the clock. I agree it’s not the same fair fight if the Vivaldi has the clock and the K1 didn’t, but I do think they likely designed the system assuming you’d have the full Vivaldi stack. 
I quite like the Mosiac app. Very easg to use, though not as feature rich as Roon. 
I’d have to agree with the person who said live music has a huge soundstage. Also, didn’t you say you felt the Ref 6 had an even wider soundstage?
I’m told the Aurender will work better as a NAS. Would be interesting to see it streamed, but I know the Vivaldi alone doesn’t have that capability like the Rossini and Bartok. 
Also consider that you’ve been listening to the K1 house sound for much longer. It definitely takes some time to reset your wars which is why professional reviewers take months. Additionally, I believe the Vivaldi takes at least a week of playing to properly warm up. As for the Boulder. Keep it!!
I only have the Rossini with Clock, which has an up sampler built in. At least in my testing, it’s the up sampler that added that really smooth, organic sound. The clock is pretty great too, especially for taking some of that digital edge off. Not sure you can really go wrong, but my suspicion is you’d hear a bigger difference with the up sampler. 
I’m not clear on how the Mutec clock works directly with the dCS. I tried reading a bit and gave up. The dCS only has a world clock input which is not what the Mutec is giving. 
What @kstaken said. The Mutec alone will not go straight into the dCS DAC. It only takes world clock. Up to you if you want to stick to dCS for that. I think most Vivaldi (and Rossini) owners use the dCS one. 
@riaa not sure why you needed to paste that here. No one argued that the Mutec couldn’t be used with the Vivaldi system, but as far as I can tell you need the Master Clock first, which @whitecamaross does not yet have. 
@whitecamaross really great updates! Definitely matches my experiences with dCS. The upsampler, especially with DSDx2, has this liquid, analog sound that’s really giving my analog rig a run for its money. 
For the speaker cables, I know you had mentioned you had tried Transparent in the past and found them warm. My experience is that Nordost leans a bit bright. It’d be interesting if you could get your hands on some Transparent speaker cables. You have a very different system now and I wonder how they’d do. Seems worth a tryout before dropping Odin 2 money. 

Didn’t see any updates about the Boulder. Still in use? I’m eagerly awaiting the 2110 preamp delivery. 
Ya, it was in the January issue of Stereophile. I got the impression from the printed review that Kal probably spent far more time setting it up as a multichannel preamp and keep in mind none of his other components are nearly as transparent as yours. I’m sure it’s a good product but I don’t think much can be determined from this review, with lack of comparisons and focus on multichannel. 
Thanks so much for the confirmation! Do you ever measure the decibels at your listening position? I generally listen with peaks in the high 70s into the mid 80s occasionally. From time to time louder, but not too frequently. 
@whitecamaross I’m considering the Alexia 2s. Am I crazy? I find the bass weight of the B&W 802D3 lacking. How are you finding the bass on the Alexias? I should have plenty of amp with the Boulder 1160. I want to feel the bass :)
@techno__dude I’m glad you took the time to recommend what I should buy based on knowing nothing about me, my space, or my setup. For you, I’d recommend the BOSE Soundbar. It’ll work with your model TV and plays music too!
I agree with @whitecamaross I’ve heard the DAW in the same space as the Alexia 2 (side by side isn’t really possible because of how sensitive Wilson are to placement) and to me it was no contest. The Alexia sounded twice as large and had bass where I felt the DAW was lacking. I found the DAW to be a bit boring sounding while the Alexia 2 was immediately engaging. 
As for SPL and @viber6. No idea what you classify as a fact, but none of what you said were facts and I don’t agree with any of it. Have you ever heard an upright (double) bass in person playing at a quiet dynamic? I think you’re confusing your opinion and unrelated anecdotal observation as fact.
@whitecamaross why Magico and which? What do you think it will bring to the party that the Alexia isn’t doing? 
I have never heard of or seen a person who preferred the DAW to the Alexia 2. Saying “many” do is meaningless. Every pro review is glowing and there isn’t a single thread on this site suggesting a trend of preferring the smaller DAW. Saying things like “Alexia is a poor speaker” accomplished nothing.