The scientific answer to these questions, about the known efficacy and acts committed to gain discernible results... the questions about them... have recently been conclusively answered in the world of reporting on cutting edge physics.
When that goes public enough (this is research and is valuable re product design and so on--so it will not be revealed as to where this data and reporting was found), the naysayers , those ’beat everyone up’ misanthropes...will simply hop onto an attack bandwagon (gangs of roving attack illiterates) on the next thing they are failing to understand.
Expect it like the Spanish inquisition.
the naysayers will poutily say.. "who’s your source on that?"
And the answer will be akin to "Los Alamos National Laboratory’, or ’the "The Planck institute of Germany", or "MIT", or.....(you get the idea).
But, you see, the noted effect was real for 20-30-40 years before that particular institute comes along and explained the science and physics behind the given noted effect. Time apparently exists but we still can’t get any functional labels on it, they all slide off. Yet everyone here accepts the existence of time.
Just like all the others noted effects that might remain afterward, or came before. Just like reality and 3-d time space has in it, all day long, since the beginnings of time.
That some institute frames the thing today does not mean it did not exist beforehand. Science's explanation is not the arbiter of reality it is just an attempt at framing an explanation. Nothing more. an explanation that is ready to change or be dismissed at any moment. Science. Mutable. By design. Correctly so.
This is one of the core problems of dogmatic minds, with said minds trying to express themselves through higher learning. They fail to understand that science does not work like that. That science is not dogma and reality existed before science and reality exists outside of science. Science is not at fault, some of the dogmatic minds that try to wave a sword around in it's name - are at fault.
When that goes public enough (this is research and is valuable re product design and so on--so it will not be revealed as to where this data and reporting was found), the naysayers , those ’beat everyone up’ misanthropes...will simply hop onto an attack bandwagon (gangs of roving attack illiterates) on the next thing they are failing to understand.
Expect it like the Spanish inquisition.
the naysayers will poutily say.. "who’s your source on that?"
And the answer will be akin to "Los Alamos National Laboratory’, or ’the "The Planck institute of Germany", or "MIT", or.....(you get the idea).
But, you see, the noted effect was real for 20-30-40 years before that particular institute comes along and explained the science and physics behind the given noted effect. Time apparently exists but we still can’t get any functional labels on it, they all slide off. Yet everyone here accepts the existence of time.
Just like all the others noted effects that might remain afterward, or came before. Just like reality and 3-d time space has in it, all day long, since the beginnings of time.
That some institute frames the thing today does not mean it did not exist beforehand. Science's explanation is not the arbiter of reality it is just an attempt at framing an explanation. Nothing more. an explanation that is ready to change or be dismissed at any moment. Science. Mutable. By design. Correctly so.
This is one of the core problems of dogmatic minds, with said minds trying to express themselves through higher learning. They fail to understand that science does not work like that. That science is not dogma and reality existed before science and reality exists outside of science. Science is not at fault, some of the dogmatic minds that try to wave a sword around in it's name - are at fault.