Mono vs stereo


Although I like stereo, often I find it contrived.  More fun than actually adding to the music realism.

I see the Beatles have a "mono" collection available.

Are there any "mono"  advocates out there? While I realize there is no "left / right" imaging, is there a sense of realism that isn't captured in stereo? 
jimspov

Showing 4 responses by bdp24

Right tostado, Brian Wilson being almost deaf in one ear is why he always mixed to Mono. And though Capitol Records insisted on putting Nik Venet’s name as producer on The Beach Boys albums, Brian was producing them right from the beginning. What would Venet know about putting Four Freshman-style vocal harmonies on top of Chuck Berry Rock ’n’ Roll and Dick Dale Surf songs, which is what the early BB sound was? And though the recording studios Brian used had Union rules requiring one of their engineers be at every session, Brian did his own mixing. No other Artist in R & R had ever done that, though Buddy Holly came close, working with Norman Petty in Petty’s small independent Clovis New Mexico studio.

It's been quite a while since I last heard the early Beach Boys LP's in non-Monaural pressings tostado (I used to have them all), but I specifically remember being surprised by the true Stereo Surfer Girl album. Emblazened across the top of the LP jacket's front cover is the huge Capitol Records' <STEREO> banner, while the other BB albums that aren't Monaural are labeled Duophonic (sometimes in very small type ;-). I'm quite certain about Surfin' Safari, Surfin' U.S.A., Little Deuce Coupe, Shut Down Volume 2, All Summer Long, Smiley Smile (a really bad recording anyway, unfortunately. It contains some of my favorite Brian Wilson writing), and Wild Honey. The last two Capitol albums, Friends and 20/20, ARE regular stereo. Their next album---Sunflower, the first for Reprise Records, had a paragraph on the back of the gatefold cover, detailing how the recording was a "True Stereo" one, not a multiple-Mono one as I described earlier. Pretty Audiophilic! I don't know whether or not it's true, but who was talking about such things in 1970?!

By the way, Capitol Records released three Beach Boys albums in 1963, three in '64, three in '65, and two in '67, with "only" one (Pet Sounds) in '66. My how the record business has changed! 

What’s very interesting about The Beatles mixes is that some songs have different instruments either included or not. In other words, a given song on an original pressing of the white album may have a guitar part on the Stereo version that is not present on the Mono! There are a number of such songs, though I can’t name them. Collectors magazines and websites can provide such information for anyone desiring it.

Music recorded in a studio on a multi-channel recorder is not really a "Stereo" recording. It is a "multiple-Mono" recording, each individual mono channel having recorded the sound of a single microphone. Each channel’s signal is then "panned" somewhere between the left and right Stereo loudspeakers during the "mixing" of the recording. True Stereo recordings are usually made with a recorder have either two or three channels, fed from a mixer combining the sound received from a microphone array (containing as few as two mics, up to maybe a dozen) placed in a large room (concert hall, church, etc.). The individual channels are NOT panned between left and right during post-recording production as are multi-Mono recordings, the mic positions having been arrived at before recording began to achieve the desired sound stage and instrument images. True Stereo recordings date mostly from the 1950’s and early 60’s.

Prior to the late 60’s, Pop And Rock ’n’ Roll LP’s were offered in both Stereo and Monaural pressings, Stereo retailing for a dollar more. The Beach Boys, The Beatles, and Bob Dylan spend days mixing the Monaural versions of their albums, leaving the Stereo mixes for an Assistant Engineer to crank out in about an hour (time is money, especially in a professional studio, now over $300/hr for the good ones). Bob Dylan’s early albums sound ridiculous in Stereo, his voice coming out of one speaker, his guitar out of the other!

Consumer alert! If buying original pressings, avoid at all costs any and all "simulated Stereo", "reprocessed from Monaural", LP’s. All they are is Monaural recordings that have had the left and right channels equalized in grossly different directions, for instance the left with all the bass removed and the right all the treble. That was done to many of the early Beach Boys albums (though the Surfer Girl album was not, for some reason. The Stereo version of that album is not reprocessed Mono), Capitol Records labeling the fake-Stereo pressings "Duophonic". They sound TERRIBLE! Reprise Records did the same thing to some of the Kinks albums. The early Kinks sound phenomenal in Mono!

In the late 60’s Rock ’n’ Rollers starting using the studio to create intentionally un-lifelike sounds---guitars jumping from left to right, for instance. The very beginning of "Listen My Friends" on the 1st Moby Grape album features that exact effect. When heard on a Monaural pressing, the beginning sounds wrong! But for Rock ’n’ Roll, the sound of all the instruments and voices combined into a single image can be much more powerful and explosive than if they are spread apart in space. The early Who albums, for instance. Live concerts are in Mono, both the left and right P.A. stacks pounding out the same sound. I like "small" music (Bluegrass, Jazz ensembles, Baroque groups, etc.) recorded in an intimate setting without a lot of post-recording electronic "sweetening" (reverb, echo, etc.) in Stereo, as the separation between instruments and voices allows the playing and singing of each to be more clearly heard, each sound inhabiting it’s own space. It fits the music, too. Those musics are often performed in small venues, and the physical positions and separation of the instruments at a live performance is replicated in the Stereo version (even if in reality actually a "simulated" Stereo multiple-Monaural recording) of the album.