In my system i preferred the canare (4s11,4s12) over mogami (3104)...had more verve/life to it...morrows a good pair of ic's.No connector is good thing.
I think the furez 124az is on par and maybe a little more on offering fwiw.
Mogami 2921 Bi wire vs Canare 4S11 Bi wire Opinions
We all know the addiction to this hobby. Well I'm looking for opinions comparing these two speaker wires. What kind of a change do you think the Canares would bring? Your thoughts will be appreciated. I know that trying the Canares would be the best answer.
My system:
NAD C 658 Preamp with HDMI module.
Parasound Halo JC5.
Audioquest NRG-Z2 Ac power cords for pre and amp.
Velodyne HGS 10 sub.
LG 65 inch TV.
Arcam DVD/CD.
Mogami XLR's By Jerry at 10 Audio. Replaced with Morrow Audio MA4's.
Audioquest Cinnamon 48 HDMI cables.
Audioquest Greyhound Sub cable.
Mogami speaker wire 2921.
Speakers are Bi-wired.
Sonus Faber Olympica III.
Probably no noticeable difference in the sound of the two types of cables but if you are running the cables internally bi-wired using only one cable per side you may hear improvement by using two separate cables (i.e., more copper) per side. Here is a termination method for the Mogami wire. You “might” also hear a difference using a solid core wire, which you can try inexpensively as described here. |
I have only used the Mogami 3104, but I doubt it would be much of a change. |
Post removed |
I have found Canare cables to be a bit lacking as they are not made of OFC copper. Check out Worlds Best Cables on Amazon. They have a wide variety of inexpensive well made cables. Dont overlook the Swiss Gotham GAC 4/1 cable. The nice thing about Amazon purchases is you can return those not suitable. Gotham also makes an excellent digital cable for about $25. Amazing for the price. |