MIT Oracle AC2-- anyone with experience?


Versus other top contenders?
ptss

Showing 5 responses by bo1972

I owned these powercables. They are outdated. Purist Audio makes superior powercables compared to these.

It is a totally different league
I listend to the newer MIT powercables as well. Compare them with Purist Audio and you will understand why they are superior.

In 16 years of time I have done thousends of tests with cables. The biggest difference is that instruments and voices are a lot more realistic in proportion. The stage is more intimate.

The articulation of voices is a lot more open and clear with the Purist Audio powercables as well.

It also gives a much more physical 3 D stage compared to the MIT.

MIT would wise they could achieve this level!!
MIT has not done a lot of research in the last years. Audioquest has made a much bigger improvement.

In one year of time I did win all battles against clients who lend MIT cables. It is that easy.

There is a lot of work to do for MIT!!
It is still a nice powercable, but in technique it is not the best anymore. Quality is Always based on the moment. After time it changes.

Newer powercables like the Purist Audio go further in parts as black level, articulation of voices, intimate stage and even drive, control and dynamics.

MIT needs to do more research in technique to catch up. In all the comparisons with MIT cables I can make the conclussion that they are behind some other brands. It has become quite easy to create a higher level with cables like Audioquest and Purist Audio.
In my country the person who sold the most MIT in the last 20 years has become Audioquest dealer as well.

His word; at this moment Audioquest is a step further in quality.

It is no coincidence that I win the shootouts against MIT so easilly.