Dig and Miles Davis and Horns are are not especially hi-fi. Neither of them were recorded by Rudy Van Gelder, although he did the masters for pressing. I have both of these on original vinyl and the sound is about what you'd expect out of early 50's recordings. Not quite a 78 but not yet up to a good 33. They were recorded on tape, but very early tape. Thin bass, a little grainy sounding, But don't let that put you off - they are terrific records. I'm especially fond of "and Horns" - great harmonies.
Miles Davis Prestige albums...
I have found these albums being sold as japanese imports, and was wondering if anyone can give me any feedback. I've never heard these albums, so I would like to know what the material is like and if anyone can vouch for the sound quality of these particular imports.
There are a few Davis albums from the Prestige label that have not been remastered, and quite frankly I'm tired of waiting so I figure I'd give these versions a shot.
Dig w/Sonny Rollins...
[IMG]http://i44.tinypic.com/2hqdxmt.jpg[/IMG]
The New Miles Davis Quintet...
[IMG]http://i43.tinypic.com/20j095d.jpg[/IMG]
Miles Davis/Milt Jackson Quintet...
[IMG]http://i42.tinypic.com/119w3ma.jpg[/IMG]
The other two that have not been remastered are "Blue Haze" and "Miles Davis and Horns". If anyone can tell me anything about these albums(thoughts, impressions etc.) I would appreciate it very much.
There are a few Davis albums from the Prestige label that have not been remastered, and quite frankly I'm tired of waiting so I figure I'd give these versions a shot.
Dig w/Sonny Rollins...
[IMG]http://i44.tinypic.com/2hqdxmt.jpg[/IMG]
The New Miles Davis Quintet...
[IMG]http://i43.tinypic.com/20j095d.jpg[/IMG]
Miles Davis/Milt Jackson Quintet...
[IMG]http://i42.tinypic.com/119w3ma.jpg[/IMG]
The other two that have not been remastered are "Blue Haze" and "Miles Davis and Horns". If anyone can tell me anything about these albums(thoughts, impressions etc.) I would appreciate it very much.
6 responses Add your response