Me vs. JL Audio - An open discussion.


An audiophile ( dpac996 ) in another thread:


https://forum.audiogon.com/discussions/eh-hem-subwoofers-what-do-ya-know


found a very interesting, and IMNSHO, very messy, post from JL Audio:

https://jlaudio.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/articles/205061040-Adding-a-Home-Audio-Subwoofer


It has some great points, some confusing points, and some word salad. Kind of like a recent Star Wars movie.


Mind you, I think JL Audio has among the very best room correction software out there. I find myself agreeing very much with the choices the software makes, but still, this article has some great things in it I want to bring out, which I'll do in my replies.
erik_squires

Showing 4 responses by ieales

The article has a good deal of useful information. I considered JL Audio, but thought the value proposition a tad lacking.

Ports are something to enjoy after dinner. IMO, ports create more problems than they solve.

One might find some useful information on integrating subs here http://ielogical.com/Audio/SubTerrBlues.php
...a mix of four or five different subs randomly positioned around the room would surely be the worst possible bass.
Thank-you for confirming. One may like it, but it is definitely not correct.
It all depends on integration. I’ve heard fine JL Audio subs in systems where I couldn’t leave the room fast enough.

IMNSHO, the sub character must mate well with the mains. As a composer friend once opined after hearing my system and enquiring "Those little speakers aren’t putting out all that gorgeous bass?!?!?!?" … "Every other subwoofer I’ve ever heard just boomed!!"
You mean, like Beethoven? The famously deaf composer?
No. Composers that write music for unamplified instruments. Then hear it played in concert or a large recording studio.

Only a small portion of Beethoven's output occurred after he was deaf.