Marantz PM Ki Ruby vs Musical Fidelity M6si


I have narrowed down the options to drive my Dali Rubicon 5s. 
I’ve heard that unlike most marantz reference series gear, the ruby is not as warm. Also, uses a Class D instead of the usual Class A or A/B.

interestingly enough, I tried the musical fidelity m5si and it sounded quite good with my speakers.  It wasn’t as bright as I expected. It was lively yet warm. My budget allows me to go for the next level, so I’m wondering if I should go for the warmer Marantz Ruby or the MF m6si instead. 
If you own either of these amps, plz could you share your thoughts? There aren’t many reviews and really need your help. thanks!

prashanth13485

Showing 3 responses by corelli

A number of months back I stepped from the Marantz 15S2 series to the Marantz KI Ruby Integrated/CD player.  Unfortunately I have no experience with the MF gear.

I purchased a "pre broken-in" pair and it was immediately apparent they were superior across the board to the 15S2 gear.  The sound stage was more expansive in each direction.  They are more transparent.  More dynamic.  More detailed.  

I have always viewed the Marantz sound as more neutral than warm.  But if it leans in a direction, the gear is always smooth, never offensive.  So yes, maybe a tad warm.

My only disappointment was to find no pre outs on the integrated.  Otherwise, the gear is a long term keeper.  
relative to the above comments, as I stated the 15S2 and the Ruby are two different amps in more ways than one.  

@prashanth 13485, you can look at my system on this site.  I have driven multiple speakers with the Ruby combo with great results.  BTW, the output of the N-core class D amp goes ballistic into low impedances.  So your 4 ohm speakers will have more power than they can handle (in a good way).
Thanks for your kind words.  A dedicated room is a huge plus.  But don't despair.  Great sound can still be achieved in a living room. (An understanding spouse goes a long way in this situation)