Mapleshade versus Stealth


Has anyone tried the Clearview Ultrathin interconnects sold for $85 1M by Mapleshade Records? Or their Clearview Double Helix interconnects, $240 1M? It sounds as if Mapleshade is onto the hugely important truth (IMHO) that interconnect wire should be thin. Stealth interconnects also reflect this truth, many other makers cheerfully ignore it. Would anyone who has tried either Clearview be able to compare it with the Stealth model closest in price? This would be ETS at entry level, a Stealth ribbon model for the higher price. Mapleshade says nothing about the metal used, so probably it's copper, while the Stealths are both silver. BTW, it seems to me that people who wax enthusiastic over such thick (relatively) wire designs as Homegrown Audio's should really give a couple of thin wire designs a try, at a comparable price level. Mapleshade, like Stealth, offers a 30-day money-back guarantee, so the experiment would be cheap.
tom_nice

Showing 6 responses by dekay

Hi Tom: I have a Mapleshade digital cable on order. I will not be able to form an opinion on it for quite some time as their are too many items that have changed in my system lately (new speakers plus added a DAC). Since the new DAC is why I purchased the new cable, I will be experiencing both units for the first time. When the system settles down I will then audition other digital cables from The Cable Co. and be able to get a grip on what the DAC and cables are doing for each other. I think that a plus of the "light" design will be that it will interfere less with the isolation devices that I use on my CD player and the ones that I will try out on my new DAC. I cannot use the Mapleshade speaker cables because the length of my runs are too long otherwise I would have liked to try them as well. I too wish that there were more write ups on these products and I am trying the cable out of curiosity. Pierre at Mapleshade also seems to be a great guy when I talk to him regarding other system matters. I think that the cable is called The Double Helix and was around $120.00 for a one meter cable -w- RCA's. There is more info at AA Cable Asylum, but I am not as familiar with the reviewers or their system/preference history as I am the members at this site . By this I just mean that if you notice that a poster tends to like/dislike and describe some gear that you feel the same way about it gives you a better reference to go on.
Come on Carl. Where is your sense of adventure? Let's hear about the Stealth cables, pretty please. LOL.
Thanks for the info Carl, and now there is the new Homegrown Silver Lace IC at approx. $190.00. I wanted to order the Mapleshade IC's with their digital cable but need to upgrade the PC on the new DAC more and could not swing both. I just got a nice upgrade from the power company, a new transformer that feeds our apartment building. I wonder how long they take to burn in? LOL.
OK: I received the Mapleshade Double Helix digital cable yesterday and have been running it for 24 hours (with very little sleep:-) - First impressions are that of jaw dropping musicality combined with fine detail. If you have not viewed the micro cables in person they are scary at first sight. The conductors are smaller than horse hair and are enclosed in a clear material thet looks like it is made out of sandwich bags (cheap thin, one use ones). The casing is not round but is flat and looks like you flattened out the packaging from a Slim Jim. I had to construct a protective shield for the cable out of a cardboard TP roll due to the fact that we have a thermostat switch in close proximety to the back of my player where the cable attaches. It is very fragile. That said they sound super off the bat and time and further comparisons (to other cables) will tell how they stack up. I am using them from a CAL Icon II to a Bell Canto DAC 1 (new in my system), the analog IC's are Homegrown Super Silver and the speakers are Reynaud Twins (also new, but broken in). Sorry, I can't say much more about the cable as I need to get aquainted with all the new gear. I also tried the new rig with my old (and familiar) Castle speakers with great results, but the new DAC makes is difficult to get a grip on how much the cable is contributing. However, I can safely say that it makes mincemeat out of the borrowed Canare digital cable that it replaced and makes me ROFL in regard to the all digital cables sound the same thread that is still active.
Danvetc: I apoligize for allowing passion into my post. It's funny in that when I hear something being touted as being musical (such as the Mapleshades) I always fear that the product will not be detailed enough, which is not the case with this cable as it has both qualities in my system. I will have to switch the silver analog IC's out with my HT Truthlinks to see how much the level of detail drops. That is as soon as I am over the shock of truely liking something for a change. I cannot use their speaker cable because my runs are too long to get the most out of them, but would like to try the analog IC's when mo money is available (they are twice the price at $240.00). I just made another barrier this afternnon in between the top of my cabinet and the wall to block access from cat paws and claws that could destroy the cable with one fell swoop (or swipe). There was also a less expensive version of the digital cable (just called Ultrathin) that was $32.50) that might do well for the powder room or the maids quarters. I have also not noticed much burn in on this cable (not anything like the silver IC's that were a horror to behold for the first 100 hours or so) if anything the LF has become a little less prominent and more integrated since they first went on.
Danvetc: Ah yes, it's all coming back to me, your post sparked my interest in these still mysterious Mapleshade cables. In regard to break in, the cables are directional and are marked (though cryptically if you do not read the instructions). Pierre at Mapleshade mentioned that the cable had to be "treated" when we were discussing the time frame as it was not ready off the shelf. I wonder what the treatment was? There is nothing in the brochure in regard to this that I can see. I am not complaining mind you, if they want to improve over the course of the next 200 hours or so, I can handle it at this point. LOL.