LTA Ultralinear Plus Integrated vs. Pass Labs XA25/EAR 868pl


I own both of these amps and can swap between them fairly quickly. I use them with Spatial Audio M3 Sapphire open baffle speakers (4 ohm impedance, 92 db sensitivity) in a 13’X16’ room. Source is 100% vinyl (Kuzma Stabi R/4Point11, Etsuru Urushi Cobalt Blue/Luxman EQ-500/Allnic AUT 2000 SUT). I listen mostly to rock, jazz and folk, and at a decent volume (85 db A-weighted peaks).

Since these are well-known pieces of kit, I will limit my comments to a  sound comparison. I’ve had the XA25 for a year, and prior to that, an XA30.5 for four years. I’ve only had the LTA a couple of months.
 

The LTA has a big sound with an expansive soundstage that seems to wrap around you whereas the XA25/EAR combo seems smaller but more nimble by comparison. The LTA’s big sound doesn’t come at the expense of detail. In fact, certain “decorative” sounds like bells, triangles and non-drum percussion seem to stand out more with the LTA. Same with vocals, which are quite forward in the mix and, possibly, not to everyone’s liking (personally I prefer it). The XA25 wins on dynamics. In fact, with the Spatials, for me, this is one of the best things about my system. But the LTA is entirely satisfactory in this department as well. Finally, to my surprise, the LTA has amazing, addictive bass that makes the Pass Labs (which until I heard the LTA, I thought produced more than adequate bass) seem anemic in the lower registers. I like the Pass Labs bass enough that I don’t use my subs. With the LTA I would say the bass I get might actually be too much for some ears. Subs are absolutely not needed.

I’ve had tubes in my phono pre and linestage for a long time but the LTA is my introduction to tube amps. The reason I own it and the Pass Labs at the same time is that I wasn’t convinced buying the LTA was going to be an improvement so I held onto both. It’s possible that the EAR is holding the XA25 back and/or the LTA preamp is superior to the EAR. The only way to find out would be to try another preamp with the XA25, which I may do. Honestly, the David Berning design of the LTA seems to provide the best attributes of both tubes and solid state, in an incredibly small, light package. Does magic exist in audio? I think so.

tangramca

Showing 3 responses by tksteingraber

Yes, LTA mentioned they paired them with Spatials at shows.  I played the LTA z40+ amp through both Goldenear Tritan 2 towers and Fritz monitors.   I now have moved to a full tube set up with a Decware Torii Jr v2 amp with Supratek Cabernet pre rotating the GE’s with Ohm Walsh Tall 2000’s.  Amazing low volume combo.

Glad to  hear you really like your LTA UL.  I had the opposite experience with an LTA Z40+ int.  Bass was weak and the amp was lifeless at low volume 50-70db (which I prefer to listen) even with nos Mullards. Soundstage and higher volumes sounded much better but still lacked tube warmth and meat.  My Raven Blackhawk sounded so much better in that regard.  Sold the LTA within a few weeks.  Just shows how everyone’s systems synergy and tastes dictate best sounding components.

@tangramca I was wondering maybe my issue was the Z40+ had too much power and when I was driving them at lower volume they suffered.  The lower power models ,like your UL, when driven at a higher amp level might be the ticket to better bass and meat. The Z40 sounded great when driven at higher volumes which I can’t live with.  Just 🤔