The "better" or "worse" thing is not going to get anyone anywhere, so I'll go with both "different and interesting" after a change in bands.
Karl Wallinger made very different music after leaving The Waterboys to found World Party.
Jeff Tweedy did something very different with Wilco after leaving Uncle Tupelo.
Peter Gabriel took a pretty sharp left turn after leaving Genesis.
I'm probably a bigger fan of Lindsey Buckingham's solo material than his Fleetwood Mac stuff, tho I love both.
You could make a pretty good case for Neil Young (after leaving Buffalo Springfield and CSNY) and a quirkier one for Stephen Stills.
I'm sure that there are plenty of others that I'd need a little time to think of.
On a related note: Many good choices here already. I actually kinda agree with the selection of George Harrison. It's not that his solo career was better than the Beatles, it's more a case of him finding his voice after leaving and producing more confident solo material than the Harrison material from his time with the Beatles. Certainly debatable, tho.
Karl Wallinger made very different music after leaving The Waterboys to found World Party.
Jeff Tweedy did something very different with Wilco after leaving Uncle Tupelo.
Peter Gabriel took a pretty sharp left turn after leaving Genesis.
I'm probably a bigger fan of Lindsey Buckingham's solo material than his Fleetwood Mac stuff, tho I love both.
You could make a pretty good case for Neil Young (after leaving Buffalo Springfield and CSNY) and a quirkier one for Stephen Stills.
I'm sure that there are plenty of others that I'd need a little time to think of.
On a related note: Many good choices here already. I actually kinda agree with the selection of George Harrison. It's not that his solo career was better than the Beatles, it's more a case of him finding his voice after leaving and producing more confident solo material than the Harrison material from his time with the Beatles. Certainly debatable, tho.