Lesson Learned


I've been an audiophile and music lover for over 30 years. It has taken me a very long time to get to the point where I'm totally satisfied with my system. I've made foolish statements declaring I will never upgrade/sell my current amplifier or preamplifier. Recently I succumb to four individuals telling me to sell my Jeff Rowland 625 S2 amplifier. Of the four, two were dealers(one dealer sold both amplifiers), one owned one of the amplifiers, and finally, my friend recommended the change. My friend all but guaranteed I was making a significant step forward. I was intrigued because both amplifiers were below 20K. So, I put my amplifier up for sale and decided to listen to their recommendations.
I auditioned the first amplifier at a retail store. Although the system was different than mine, I was familiar with a couple of the components. I listened for several hours and decided that amplifier wasn't for me. I listened to the second amplifier at my very good friend's house. All four of the aforementioned individuals recommended the second amplifier. My initial listening session showed a lot of promise. I was convinced that it indeed may be a step-up from my 625 S2 in some categories. In particular, the bass seemed more powerful. I was unsure about the midrange and highs, but I was interested in listening again. A couple days later I returned and listened with music that I was very familiar with. The second session had me confused. I told my friend the only way to really be sure about which one I preferred was with an home audition.
So, it was show time. I disconnected my Jeff Rowland 625 S2 and connected the mono-amplifiers. From the first note I was almost certain of the outcome. I began by playing Kirk Whalum's For You CD. Although the amplifier was broken in with several hundred hours on it, something just didn't sound correct. I decided to let the music play in the background for awhile prior to doing any serious listening. I played song after song. It's funny that this amplifier was praised for its outstanding midrange and bass, but the 625 S2's midrange was more detailed, had more air, and just had a more convincing "illusion" of live sound. The bass on the other amplifier had slightly louder bass, but it lacked the articulation and realism of the 625 S2's bass. Of course I'm keeping my Jeff Rowland 625 S2. The 625 S2 may not be everyone's preference, but I submit it's much better than I ever expected. More than any individual component, I believe my system has synergy. Having synergy will make it very hard to improve upon without spending a significant amount of money or going in a drastically different direction. 
I refused to name the other amplifiers, because it's about my journey and my lesson learned. I don't want my posting to turn into an argument about product "X" against product "Y". I sincerely hope my story will provide "food for thought" for anyone contemplating changing any component because someone else suggested to do so. Trust you own ears! No matter what anyone recommends, if your "ears" don't recommend it, trust your own ears! Finally, just because I preferred the 625 S2 in my system doesn't invalidate the recommendations. Audiophiles hear differently, have different preferences and expectations. In addition, it's more about the "system" than an individual component. This has truly reinforced that there are no absolutes in audio, only preferences.
ricred1

Showing 2 responses by hoodjem

Lesson Learned:

Just over a year ago I bought a one-meter Analysis Plus toslink cable. I use toslink cable to go from an AudioEngine B1 Bluetooth receiver into my Marantz SACD 30n’s DAC section.  (The AudioEngine B1 does have analogue outputs, but then you are using the little chip inside the B1 for digital conversion.  I use the AudioEngine to receive streamed files from my iPad.  It seems to work better with no dropouts than the Bluetooth receiver part of the Marantz.) 

 

When I inserted the AP toslink cable I was a little disappointed.   It seemed  to reveal a tiny bit more detail and air, but also seemed a little bright, edgy, and lean.  I went back and forth comparing it to my not very expensive Warrky toslink cable.  The Warrky cable lost a tiny bit of detail, but sounded smoother and fuller. 
 

The Marantz has two digital Toslink inputs so I just left both of them plugged in to the Marantz.  But at the time I preferred the cheaper Warrky cable for its greater fullness and richness.  It seemed to have more synergy with my system.  So I’ve been using the Warrky cable for the last year. (I could have returned the Analysis Plus cable because I purchased it from an online dealer with a 30-day satisfaction guarantee, but I kept it not wanting to go through that bother.) 

Fast forward to today.  In the past two weeks I have replaced all the power cables to my monoblock amps, electrostatic speakers, and brand new subwoofers.  My system has never sounded so lush, full, and rich.  Just wonderful!

But today, I played one of my specially created “Audio Evaluation” playlists, and it didn’t sound right.  It sounded really good, but I knew there was more detail, more air, and more space to be heard on these tracks.   
 

Then I remembered the Analysis Plus toslink cable.  And I plugged that back into the B1 and switched to the other toslink input on the Marantz.  Immediately, I heard all the detail, air, and precision I’d been missing.  Warmth, smoothness, richness, but also detail, air, and space.  Wonderful and amazing!
 

I just keep telling myself:  “I sure am glad I did not return the Analysis Plus toslink cable.”

 

I guess the lesson I learned was that you may not like something on day 1, or day 2, or day 3.

 

But you may really like it on day 366.