LCD-2 from 2011


I own an Audeze LCD-2 from 2011. I think it's revision 2. It's pre-fazor. Anyway I get a bit of glare and peakiness in the treble. I've seen an FR curve for this headphone and it does have a prominent 4K peak. Does anyone experience this? 

What if I got a newer Audeze headphone? Does anyone think they are smoother? I've heard the LCD-X but it was way back. I've also heard fazor LCD-2's but liked mine better.

I have a premium cable with the connectors Audeze used in 2011... I think it's a min-XLR with 4 pins. Does Audeze still use that connector?

magon

Showing 2 responses by magon

I'm using a custom 12AU7/FET zero feedback amp designed by a brilliant designer/technician I work with frequently. I discovered that my tube selection, an RCA Clear Top, may have had something to do with it. It's smoother with a French military Radio Technique I got from Upscale Audio.

I got a used LCD-X, 2021 version. It's a good match for a DAC I have on hand for a trial period, the Gustard R26. My older DAC, a modifed Gustard x20pro, was pretty bright, so that could have emphasized the peakiness in the LCD-2. In any case I like the X/R26 combination better. The only thing is that the LCD-X is a little rolled off on the high end, and the R26 isn't good at presenting the highest frequency details such as hall ambience. Through my speakers (Spendor S3/5) the high end of the R26 sounds better, but the imaging is not good compared to my modified x20pro. I'm trying to figure out whether I want a more extended, spacious headphone than the LCD-X, or whether I should modify the R26 in some way (perhaps a reversible mod: get a good 10 MHz clock).