Law Of Diminishing Returns?


I'm curious about what you enthusiasts think of the product or price that eclipses your definition of "value".  

As an example I have a rich buddy that just spent 100K upgrading his (former) Pass 600s / Bryston / B&W Signature 800s / JL Fathom 8 speaker  system. I have a discerning ear and cannot hear the difference between the old system and his new S5M Perlistons (4) , Anthem AVN90, ,ATI amp AT6005 (4) and four subs.

This got me to thinking- 80% more money for maybe 20% more sound quality? 

Where is the sweet spot for the discerning ear and the affluent but not Billionaire (think Doctor/Lawyer/Indian Chief) budget?  Can you get 80% HiFi sound for 20K or do you need to spend 100K to get that HiFi sound?

-Asking for a friend :)

128x128Ag insider logo xs@2xyesiam_a_pirate

Showing 1 response by motown-l

I consider myself a stereo enthusiast vs being an audiophile. The main difference? Budget. I've been in this hobby since the early 70's and have had many different components over the years. I had to sell my prized stereo during a contentious divorce (in the 90's) and never bought to that level again. 

I now find that I like used and carefully researched mid-fi equipment. My personal rule of thumb is never to pay over $1K for any single piece of equipment. Cable prices are based on no more than 10% of the price of the equipment being hooked to them. These are arbitrary numbers based on what I am willing to invest in audio at this point in my life, the quality of my 68 year old hearing and my audio compromised listening space. 

I did manage to buy one Stereophile Class B rated component, for my humble system.