KT88 vs 6550 vs ? for warm midrange - using Cronos Mag lll


I've been listening to an ST70 with EL34 Tubes & really enjoy the Sound .

Using the Cronos with KT120's  it's a different sound / feel - sounds wonderful but seems either more balance / neutral overall . Maybe more lower end but not as sweet in mid range as the 34's 

34's in the cronos is possible but not really advisable [ too much current into tubes - 1/2 the life span  even with proper biasing ] 

I've been running the amp in Triode mode and seem to prefer sound .  Listening levels are moderate / low  avg 75 db 

I'm good with the kt120's but maybe another tube would bring more mids to the game 

 

* Note - I have changed All the preamp tube to NOS - It has been a significant improvement !-  Telefunken is at center  12au7 , flanked by RCA clear tops , 2 GE ax7 's 

Any suggestions for power tubes is most welcome - Rogue audio is shipping  kt88's in lieu of the 120's [ for yrs due to war etc.] 

what's gained or lost when changing from the 120's ?

 

forgot - Primary Speakers - Dynaudio special 40's , primary source is Vinyl 

 

Thanks  

 

mfm22

I guess to more directly address your question - exactly who said EL34 would have less lifespan here, unless you’re purposely biasing to run hot? That’s the first ever I’ve heard this. The bias on these amps is infintely adjustible per tube, and an EL34 can handle much more plate voltage than these amps throw at it. In fact the original Cronus and Atlas shipped with EL34 (I had an Atlas like this - it is a Cronus without the 12AU7 "preamp" tube and volume control).

As for tube sonics - Tung-Sol KT120’s give a perception of more powerful bass. Its midrange can be a little drier than with Gold Lion KT88, so probably not the right move for what you want. 6550 should not be a problem in these amps - very close to KT88. I’ve even used Tung-Sol 7581A (very close to a 6L6GC, not that close to 6550 / KT88) in Rogue amps - you’re probably approaching its plate voltage limits, but it worked in the ST100 and gave a bit of a more "classic" tube sound versus KT88 / KT100. A nice tube in the ST100, at least. Been years since I ran my old Atlas with British EL34, but that was pretty decent. The Mullards do what they can on these amps - they will never be "warm"-warm. You put those same Mullards in an Eico EF-87 and you get WARM-warm. 

12AU7 is probably used as a driver tube, which means it adds no gain and probably has little effect on SQ.  However, in my experience, there is no such thing as a good sounding 12AU7.  I replace them with 12FQ7 or 6FQ7 (depending on the available filament voltage), which sound noticeably better. If you're swapping power tubes willy nilly, then you need to be aware of how the amplifier can run one tube vs another.  If the plate voltage, grid bias, etc, are inappropriate for one tube vs another, then that is going to affect how you judge the tube. Ideally you would want to reconfigure the amplifier to run the power tube under conditions that optimize its performance, before you judge the tube. That usually can be done merely by changing a few resistors after taking measurements of voltages.

lewm:

Yes, two 12au7’s are used to drive the power tubes and the  two 12ax7’s are phase splitters (I think?).

The 3rd 12au7 would be the one to roll to something warmer/fuller sounding like Mullard or Amperex (just avoid later Amperex 12au7’s with a dimpled disc getter).

So, one or two 12au7 tubes to roll (Amperex,/Mullard/RCA?) as an experiment as opposed to quads of power tubes.

 

DeKay

 

Okay - I'm looking at changing the 12ax7's - suggestions ? 

will leave the power tubes alone for now .

 

I agree the way the Cronos is set up it's an uphill battle to try and get the EL34 sound 

All modern-ish Rogue tube amps use a 12AU7 tube as driver per push-pull pair of KT tubes. The Apollo and Zeus used a pair of 12AU7 to drive fully three push-pull pairs of KT. I agree with the asssement that 12AU7 is not a great tube. I definitely prefer push-pull amps that use 6SN7 drivers, or really anything else. 

But due to the fact it’s perhaps a bit "under-powered" in this driver role, it does make a noticeable difference to tube roll these slots. Similar-type subs are a good choice for most effect. 12BH7 is a sub I’ve used many times - it’s much more dynamic, detailed, and punchy than a 12AU7, though to be fair the Rogue amps were already strong there. The 12AU7 will give a more "homogenous" sound - maybe preferable to some ears and systems. I didn’t try other type subs. Note a 12BH7 eats up more heater curent - 0.6A per sub versus 0.3A - but when each KT tube is sucking down 1.5A - 1.8A, the extra A’s from a couple 12BH7 are unlikely to cause issue. Rogue (Mark) used to bless this sub, though they might have clammed up on this more recently. I used it for years with no issue.

The extra center 12AU7 on Cronus is an input / gain slot. Good to roll there. 12BH7’s tends to be noise and microphonic so it’s best to keep them at the downstream driver slots.

If you do try 12BH7 - Sylvanias and Tung-Sols are very clean, detailed, and punchy (Tung-Sols tending a bit more toward bright); RCA’s are warmer and richer.