Krell Moves to new location

Reading this thread is sad for me.  There have been so many missed opportunities to support brand goodwill by simple communications.

Can such destruction of value be deliberate?  For the experienced legal minds among us, I ask Which parties benefit from having a lower valuation for Krell assets?  If the value of Krell goes to zero, who avoids inheritance tax or . . . ?

Good news.  There's light at the end of the tunnel.

The delays have greatly diminished the value of the business, thus minimizing any inheritance taxes.

However, while it isn't worth much as a standalone business, it could be sold for significantly more to a deep pocketed high end company who could rejuvenate it and reestablish the brand.

@bulldogger  Thank you for the reassuring update.  I read your post with interest and I wanted to ask you about one sentence that i did not understand:

"Steve owns ALL of the Krell assets, Krell still belongs to Kris D'Agostino."

This sounds a little self contradictory.  What am I missing?