KCI Silkworm vs Cable Research Labs Copper?


Anyone compared the KCI Silkworm with the exceptional Cable Research Labs Copper IC? Ditto Ridge Street Poiema-3 ?
pmboyd
Arthur, I don't have the Silkworm ICs, but am considering them. I'm looking for a dac-pre cable that is detailed yet relaxed, with harmonic depth. Too many cables sound thin and emotionally uninvolving to me.
Well, after living with for a while, the CRL Copper has definite weaknesses that I won't go into at this time. So it's back to the drawing board. I'm now considering the Fusion Romance line. Any comments on that, particularly the Romance II?
I just realized the cable listed was CRL not TRL. My mistake.
Sorry for the mistake.
I owned both. I loved the Silkworm, but the TRL cable caused me to sell the silkworm after the first week.

Yes, I am selling the TRL now, but ONLY because I can't use it's lengh in my new rack. The TRL cable is quite stiff.

I forgot to mention this cable as a past one I have owned. I have owned to many:-)

Anyway the TRL/FIM sliver has far better dynamics and punch. It is also more transparent and delivers more weight and scale. It throws a far wider and deeper stage.

The Silkworm is a tad warmer and the highs more "set back".

You can take my comments with a grain of salt if you like as I do have the TRL Silver for sale and some may think I am "selling".

That is not my intent. Both are good. I found the TRL simply opened up more of the music and got more out of the way.