I am ambivalent about West Coast "easier" jazz. Some of it is really great -- Ritenour, Larry Carlton, for example. Other stuff from that region sometimes strikes me almost like Muzak, though that's too harsh. It's "jazz for bourgeois white people," in a way. Nothing wrong with liking what you like -- and not everything has to be Coltrane wailing away, etc. -- but for my tastes, I'd much prefer the "ease" of, say, a Kenny Barron than the schmaltz of a Bob James. But that's me.
Showing 2 responses by hilde45
@judsauce I gave you my opinion, based on 40 years of listening and learning about jazz. It doesn’t align with yours. We have different tastes.
You’ve phrased this in a way which puts me down. That’s on you. But I don’t doubt his talent. He’s very very talented within a style and genre which I don’t prefer. I’m sure there are people who are very good at golf or sailing. There are experts at making Mac n' Cheese or paper airplanes. They can all be talented experts. I just don’t appreciate those things either.
And now...this. Why would you get so defensive about this artist that you’re saying this? Really, man, you need to understand that people appreciate -- and evaluate -- things differently. I’ll be going now and I know you won’t miss me, but you’ve shown me (and others) who you are. So that’s your burden, now. |