I used both. The brio runs out of steam before Mira 3 will, you get the sense that things are being pushed foward with a loss of composure when you crank it. At moderate levels the Brio is nicely musical. In a nutshell it is "good for the price" performance, similar to NAD. That said the Mira 3 is more detailed and 3D- as you noticed. The Mira holds together better at higher levels- it plays cleaner and still has the 'ol Rega "timing", bass is not very weighty, but you will hear every note clearly. Brio bass is a little softer. Brio design is based on an old radio circuit and I found it to be sensitive to RFI in my environment. I would keep the Mira or consider a true step up.
is the rega brio better than the rega mira 3
I've recently bought a rega mira 3 / apollo combo going through B &W 601 speakers. Currently struggling with trying to decide whether I like the amp or not. The Mira doesn't have the strength my former amp (old NAD 372PE) had - which used to make the 601s sing, but it does have a different pace and more detail. I've heard the Brio is a better match, but is it a better amp? I'm thinking of a sub / different speakers to get the match right, or even changing the amp altogether. Would appreciate any suggestions. Musically not a head banger - enjoy melodic indie, rock, alternative, instrumental across the board.
3 responses Add your response