Is the Merill "Gem Dandy" turntable far superior in sound than the Project RPM-3 TT??


I am thinking of selling my Thorens TD 145 which was upgraded, but has overstayed its welcome on my audio rack. Therefore,   I have initially looked at the Project RPM-3 turntable which has been improved and is also packaged with a Sumiko Blue Point 2 moving coil. The official retail is $ 999.00 on Audio Adviser and the Needle Doctor


However, I read a recent review in Stereophile about  George Merrill's "Gem Dandy" turntable which retails for $1695 with A Jelco SA-750 (9 inch tonearm), or $1495 with the Jelco SA-250 ( 9 inch  tonearm)  Both  DON'T COME WITH A CARTRIDGE.  I have seen a few already on sale used on Audiogon.

Would like some feedback from any member about either the Project table cited above or the two Merrill tables with different tonearms.   Will either of the Merrill tables be far superior to the Project in sound quality?? And is it worth the extra money, plus a quality cartridge would have to be added.with the Merrill's TT. which ups the bottom line in price 

Thank you

    

sunnyjim
To each their own.  Like I said, some people like the colorations of the Rega.
Thread title:
Is the Merrill "Gem Dandy" turntable far superior in sound than the Project RPM-3 TT??

Given that the Merrill is only $500 more than the Pro-Ject, it only needs to be incrementally better, not "far superior."

If it were $2500 vs. $1000, it should be immediately noticeably better, but still not "far superior."

To make an illustration from (the "golden age" of stereo, the Technics SL1200 DD ’table was $350 in 1975. The Hitachi P-38 was $250. Adjusted for inflation the Technics would be $1556 and the Hitachi would be $1112 today. That’s roughly the same price difference adjusted for inflation. The Hitachi had an MDF plinth finished in rosewood-grain vinyl. The Technics had the aluminum/synthetic constrained layer construction and more sophisticated controls. It was better built and probably held up better, but to my ears didn’t really sound better. IME good imaging and soundstage came easily to the Hitachi while it's proved elusive with the Technics. Anyway, a $100 increase in 1975 is equivalent to a $500 increase in 2016, and while we expected some sort of "improvement" for that $100, nobody expected "far superior" for $100 in 1975.

The GEM Dandy may be worth the difference just for the fluid-damped Jelco arm. And while I like the Pro-Ject Carbon line, I really get some use out of interchangeable headshells, esp. when I want to spin some mono records with a mono cartridge.

I have numerous tables (custom Garrard 301, 401, Rega RP3 and RP6; Luxman PD-444 and 555; VPI TNT and Scout; Analog Seduction; Scheu; Technics SP-10 MkIII to name a few) all were used with a variety of tonearms (SME, Schroeder, Wheaton, FR, Stax) and cartridges too many to mention.  I now own a Merrill Gem Dandy Poly table with the Jelco 750 10" arm and a Hana low out put MC cartridge.....  I can confidently say that the Merrill is one EXCEPTIONAL table that performs way beyond its price tag of $2000.  Don't be fooled by the price tag....this table is one awesome sounding tt, with or without the price as a consideration....
I realize that this is a ancient thread, but since Samurai bumped it I just want to share:

NEVER buy a pro-ject table packaged with a Sumiko Blue Point 2 - You're paying a large premium for what is essentially one the crappiest cartridges for the money that I've ever heard (been there/ done that).

Just sayin'

Greg. Thank you for your comment. It is useful if I go shopping for a new cartridge, or cartridge and table.    S.J