2. tech-talk
  3. 185322-20042

Is simpler better?

I have been adding components in my audio systems and subtracting as well at times. Over some time now, I wondered if I hear better resolution, dynamics, clarity and get closer to the recorded music when I keep the path short and simple. I mean one source, one integrated amp and to the speakers. Or even a digital component to a DAC then to the integrated amp and finally to speakers. Bypassing the preamp or in some cases bypassing a separate DAC. It certainly elimates the need for redundant volume or gain, reducing wires or cables, reducing the chance for incompatible components and keeping the path short.

For those using turntable(s), does the combination of phono preamp, platter, tonearm, cartridge, motor, isolation get to be too much to manage? To get the best sound? 

Your thoughts? Your experience?

128x1282psyop

Showing 1 response by ghdprentice

ghdprentice
6,394 posts
 

Generally as simple as possible, but not simpler. Not using a preamp typically significantly reduces the sound quality. Typically separate preamp and amps sound better than integrated… but you have to be carefull how you compare.

Two box preamps, monoblocks amps sound better than stereo amps. But adding non-essential functions and boxes is not better.

Overall “straight wire” systems, with the shortest possible path and least functions (no tone controls, no extra manipulation) sound best.

More to discover