Hi, Rob:
Several months ago, the Bryston newsletter (which they publish on their Web site) contained a short but interesting discussion between James Tanner (sort of the technical guru at Bryston) and Dennis Sands, one of the top recording engineers in Hollywood, who has been responsible for the sound tracks of a very large number of the major movies during the past 5 years.
The gist of the interview was that Hollywood is only now producing good quality 5.1 channel soundtracks, and has little or no interest in moving to 6.1, much less 7.1 channel sound. In the personal opinions of both Sands and Tanner, there is almost no reason to buy the expanded HT fo(see the lower article titled "Encode vs. Decode":rmats at this time, since there will be essentially no software for the foreseeable future.
Beyond that, James Tanner commented that only a small handful of homes have dedicated home theater rooms large enough to fully capitalize on the expanded formats.
So, unless you have a very large HT room, or simply want to be an "early adopter", there isn't much reason for rushing into 6.1 or 7.1 channel surround, and no reason whatsoever for 10.2 channel (at Tomlinson Holman has espoused).
For more info, here are links to articles on the Bryston web site that "tells it like it is":
1. http://www.bryston.ca/newsletters/55_files/vol5is5.html (see the lower article titled "Encode vs. Decode")
2. http://www.bryston.ca/newsletters/64_files/vol6is4.html (interview with Hollywood recording engineer Dennis Sands)
Several months ago, the Bryston newsletter (which they publish on their Web site) contained a short but interesting discussion between James Tanner (sort of the technical guru at Bryston) and Dennis Sands, one of the top recording engineers in Hollywood, who has been responsible for the sound tracks of a very large number of the major movies during the past 5 years.
The gist of the interview was that Hollywood is only now producing good quality 5.1 channel soundtracks, and has little or no interest in moving to 6.1, much less 7.1 channel sound. In the personal opinions of both Sands and Tanner, there is almost no reason to buy the expanded HT fo(see the lower article titled "Encode vs. Decode":rmats at this time, since there will be essentially no software for the foreseeable future.
Beyond that, James Tanner commented that only a small handful of homes have dedicated home theater rooms large enough to fully capitalize on the expanded formats.
So, unless you have a very large HT room, or simply want to be an "early adopter", there isn't much reason for rushing into 6.1 or 7.1 channel surround, and no reason whatsoever for 10.2 channel (at Tomlinson Holman has espoused).
For more info, here are links to articles on the Bryston web site that "tells it like it is":
1. http://www.bryston.ca/newsletters/55_files/vol5is5.html (see the lower article titled "Encode vs. Decode")
2. http://www.bryston.ca/newsletters/64_files/vol6is4.html (interview with Hollywood recording engineer Dennis Sands)