Much as I agree in general with the conclusions of Nrchy and Gs5556 with respect to components, I suggest they actually try combinations of IC and Speaker Cables and see what they experience.
I have certainly found the theory of biasing expenditure towards the source to be very sound, but that the idea does not apply so well to cables.
I do not buy for a minute the mantra of "which comes first, is the most important", and claiming it to have an unassailable logic is simply incorrect.
While you might claim no speaker cable can right the wrongs of the interconnect, it seems equally likely to me that no interconnect can be so good that a poor speaker cable that follows it will sound anything better than a poor speaker cable.
If good means "quality in, quality out", and bad means "quality in, garbage out", then a bad IC followed by good speaker cable results in "quality in, garbage out", and a good IC followed by bad speaker cable also results in "quality in, garbage out". Such simple binary logic fails to lead to any conclusion. Therefore the issue is resolved by examining incremental benefit for incremental dollars spent - the answers for each being a curve not a straight line, meaning the answer may change as the dollars spent goes up.
Therefore logic gets you nowhere, despite the claims in the previous two posts. I suggest some experience of trying different combinations is a good idea in that case.
I have certainly found the theory of biasing expenditure towards the source to be very sound, but that the idea does not apply so well to cables.
I do not buy for a minute the mantra of "which comes first, is the most important", and claiming it to have an unassailable logic is simply incorrect.
While you might claim no speaker cable can right the wrongs of the interconnect, it seems equally likely to me that no interconnect can be so good that a poor speaker cable that follows it will sound anything better than a poor speaker cable.
If good means "quality in, quality out", and bad means "quality in, garbage out", then a bad IC followed by good speaker cable results in "quality in, garbage out", and a good IC followed by bad speaker cable also results in "quality in, garbage out". Such simple binary logic fails to lead to any conclusion. Therefore the issue is resolved by examining incremental benefit for incremental dollars spent - the answers for each being a curve not a straight line, meaning the answer may change as the dollars spent goes up.
Therefore logic gets you nowhere, despite the claims in the previous two posts. I suggest some experience of trying different combinations is a good idea in that case.