Ingress Audio Engineering


I recently discovered the benefits of isolation. Don't know how many of you are familiar with Barry Diament's  recommendations for his hip joints. The recommendation for the economical DIY set up worked well for my stereo; (lightly inflated bike innertubes, wooden egg holders supporting stainless steel balls).

http://www.barrydiamentaudio.com/vibration.htm

A month ago I bought Isoacoustic Oreo's. 3 per component (weight appropriate) and was very impressed...at first. After several days of settling my music sounded dull and lifeless. I reread the optimal weight recommendations, re-calibrated weight limits with temporary improvements. To my disappointment I realized the Oreo's could only be compressed (especially after the suction seal was formed between them and the component or platform the component sat on). Sure they rocked in all directions, but they didn't glide in all directions. Only horizontal isolation was taking place so I coupled the Oreo's with Barry's economic hip joints which has greatly improved the SQ. I'm loving it but I still feel there's room for improvement. Mainly because I own the Hfiman HE-6SE HP's and I run them through my power amp's speaker taps. So I want Barry's upgraded hip joints under my amp. I'm interested in Ingress Audio's vibration isolation rollerblocks.

http://www.ingress-engineering.ca/products-and-services.php
I've looked up info about their level 2's and 3's but specifics on their differences aren't given. I know Barry says the blocks should be machined smooth to a certain degree. I left a message with Ingress, but I'm impatient and wondering if perhaps the level 2's aren't as smooth as the 3's. The smoother, the greater the improvements. My question is does anyone know the differences between their Level 2 and Level 3 rollerblocks?
mewsickbuff
Hi Stefano

Suggest combination of Geoff’s springs with Ingress cup and rollers, set up on granite or slate platform.
Very interesting thread, albeit I’m two years late... machina dynamica website seems short of resources (I cannot see some photos). Geoff are you still behind your business? Might be interested in your springs.

Stefano
Based on Barry Diament you can do it yourself or try ingress engineering.  To see how this started, read these 2 threads.

audiophilestyle  equipment isolation and vibration damping
steve hoffman attention barry diament and other speaker isolation gurus!
I had got Ingress Audio Engineering level 3 yesterday.

It seem to have positive effect of more natural sound under Chord Mscaler.

I will  update the progress in the future.
I bought the Gaia II's for my 60 lb Monitor Audio Gold's. Experimented connecting them to the metal speaker base's then directly to the speaker. Found they sound more focused when attached directly to the speaker. Since my floor is carpeted with a basement beneath I then tried elevating them on wood slabs with Barry's economic hip joints underneath, but they sounded kind of dull. Next I sat the speakers on ceramic tile slabs (smooth side down) with the economic hip joints underneath. Sounds great! The treble sparkle and shimmer is back along with focus and improved timbre!


Post removed 
When granite or bluestone or whatever is placed on springs it’s isolated right along with the component. Also, when the slabs are two or three inches thick they will not ring unless you strike them with a hammer. Even then they go thunk!  Also, don’t strike them with a hammer whilst music is playing. The great advantages of such materials is their stiffness and mass.
I tried a slab of marble back in the 80's; it rang too much for my liking. Perhaps with a sheet of constrained layer damping between it and another slab of something with different resonance characteristics would be good.
Slate actually appears to have much in common with bluestone. To whit,

Slate is a fine-grained, foliated, homogeneous metamorphic rock derived from an original shale-type sedimentary rock composed of clay or volcanic ash through low-grade regional metamorphism. It is the finest grained foliated metamorphic rock. Wikipedia

bdp24
5,265 posts
05-21-2019 2:07amDamn, 3" thick?! What's one weigh?

>>>>A lot.
So Bluestone is a type of limestone, so granular in nature. Slate on the other hand has fissibility, which means it’s layered, that might mean its good at damping vibrations? In tests it seems that way. Geoff thanks for info.
I used to buy bluestone 18”x18”x3” slabs at Home Depot for around $20 each. Dunno about availability in other locations. 

Everything you never wanted to know about bluestone, 

Bluestone is quarried in western New Jersey, Pennsylvania and eastern New York.[15] It is also quarried in the Canadian Appalachians near Deer Lake in Western Newfoundland.[16]The Pennsylvania Bluestone Association has 105 members, the vast majority of them quarriers.[17] Bluestone from Pennsylvania and New York is sandstone defined as feldspathicgreywacke. The sand-sized grains from which bluestone is constituted were deposited in the Catskill Delta during the Middle to Upper Devonian Period of the Paleozoic Era, approximately 370 to 345 million years ago. The Catskill Delta was created from runoff from the Acadian Mountains ("Ancestral Appalachians").[18] This delta ran in a narrow band from southwest to northeast and today provides the bluestone quarried from the Catskill Mountains and Northeast Pennsylvania. The term "bluestone" is derived from a deep-blue-colored sandstone first found in Ulster County, New York.[citation needed] It can, however, appear in many other hues, mostly shades of grays and browns. Bluestone quarrying is of particular value to the economy of Susquehanna County, Pennsylvania. The Starrucca Viaduct, finished in 1848, is an example of Pennsylvania bluestone as a building material.[17]

Starrucca Viaduct, Pennsylvania, U.S.

The other, lesser known, type of American 'bluestone' is a blue-tinted limestone abundant in the Shenandoah Valley of Virginia. It is a limestone formed during the Ordovician Period approximately 450 to 500 million years ago, at the bottom of a relatively shallow ocean that covered what is today Rockingham County, Virginia. The limestone that accumulated there was darker in color than most other limestone deposits because it was in deeper waters exposed to less light. The darker blue color resulted in limestone from this region being dubbed bluestone and with two sequences measuring about 10,000 ft thick, it gives the area one of the largest limestone deposits in the world.[19] The stone eventually fades from a deep blue to a light grey after prolonged exposure to sun and rain. Given the abundance of the stone in the Rockingham County area, the first settlers used it as foundations and chimneys for their houses. When James Madison University was built, the local bluestone was used to construct the buildings because of its high quality and cultural heritage.[20]


Great, thanks for the info Geoff. I’ll check the weight of my set ups.

What is bluestone? Is that slate?

Folkfreak, isn’t Herzan an active platform originally designed for microscopes?
It’s easier to get better “action” for the set-up with four springs, all things being equal. By “action” I mean how easy it is to put the top plate and component into smooth vertical up and down motion by bouncing the top plate manually. For moderately light components I would preload the springs with granite or bluestone. My Cryo Baby Prometheans are rated at around 40-50 lb for four springs. Add a spring for every ten pounds over 50 lb. My Super Stiff Springs are rated at around 80-120 lb for four springs.

My springs are designed to achieve better performance (circa 2-3 Hz) than almost any pneumatic device. And there is no leakage issue, no guessing at the air pressure, and no friction or damping issues, either, with my springs as there are with pneumatic designs. When you think about it it’s kind of a no brainer. 😳
Re Stacore -- I'm not sure I see anything new or particularly innovative in their approach. The basic isolation is passive pneumatic which is well established and the top plate is slate -- which some like, others see as problematic. They've put it together in a nice and easy to use package but I'm disappointed by the lack of detailed measurements so we can see how they really compare with alternatives in the 1-10Hz range. If anyone has these can you post a link -- I couldn't find them on the Stacore site

If we really want to talk top end I'm a big fan and user of the Taiko Tana -- their modified Herzan. Here the top plate is Panzerholz which also has its detractors -- really there are no simple answers! 
Geoff, thanks for info, do you recommend three or four springs?

Stacore maybe the current reference standard in isolation? What do you think? I know somebody that has a few of them in the U.K. Costly though. Aeris Cerat were using them at Munich this year. But I think Ingress/slate platform/spring would be much more cost effective at around £250 complete per set. Stacore £5k.
Uneven loads are handled by moving one or more spring slightly so the load is equally distributed among the springs. 
My springs are more cost effective than the pods. Besides, I don’t advertise or recommend my springs for speakers, anyway, except medium-size speakers and subwoofers (low center of gravity). My springs are primarily for amps, turntables, CD players and subwoofers. I suspect most of the cost of the Townshend pods is the attached framework that allows the pods to be widely spaced underneath speakers with a high center of gravity,

Even when speakers ARE isolated, front end components are still subject to low frequency vibration from the floor. My springs allow someone to *cost effectively* isolate everything -except big tall heavy speakers. Actually, a large 2’x2’ maple board under the speakers will solve the problem using my springs for speakers with a high center of gravity. The 2’x2’ board allows a wide pattern for my springs, thus building up the lateral support needed for stability. Problem solved!
We import Ingress footers into the U.K., available for free test drives if interested.

Our best set up so far, consists of three Ingress cup and rollers with titanium balls arranged in an equilateral triangle around the centre of mass of the component sitting on top of a 30mm thick plate of slate which is cut square on plan. This in turn sits on 12 inch diameter inner tubes inflated to around 3 psi. We use a digital gauge. We have found tubes by Specialized to keep their inflation better than some other brands.

Result: massive improvements in sound quality, one of the best and cheapest upgrades you can make imo. We sell other brands of better known isolators but they don’t come close to this set up. If you are concerned about losing air in the tube overtime then you could use something like IsoAcoustics Orea’s but they don’t work as well as the tubes in this set up and only cost £3 each. Geoff’s springs might be the answer under the slate platform, I will try.

We also use Ingress footers in a double cup arrangement under our solid maple audio furniture to further isolate. If your speakers don’t have an effective isolation system (like spikes for example) then the Ingress footers should be used there as well. We have no need because the Boenicke speakers we sell have a built in swing base system which comprises of a metal bridge which is hung from cables with a ceramic roller ball and bronze cup arrangement built into the front underside of the speakers. This works a treat.

Btw we are looking into cementing on another valve on the outside of the tubes so it would then be possible to inflate without moving the equipment.

@geoffkait, by "secrets" I meant how your springs differ from the commonly-available, off-the-shelf springs. I doubt you make them yourself, but you do cryogenetically freeze them. Anything else you care to divulge? ;-) Not that I expect you to; I wouldn’t!

In one of his video (viewable on You Tube), Max Townshend demonstrates the difference between his Seismic Pod and a bare spring of the same rate. Very interesting.

@geoffkait
when using springs, how does one deal with uneven loads?
My pre's CG is way off to one side towards the rear.  Does one just add another spring under the heaviest portion?

Just as a partial solution for now until I can get two more sets of the v2 blocks.

I used my maple blocks, installed 3 spikes underneath them which also meant by adjusting the back spike I can adjust the angle of the Maggies.
These spikes sit in Herbies Small Gliders on the carpeted floor.

For now the Maggies sit on the maple blocks on top of some extremely solid composite rubber like material ( no idea what it is exactly, I "acquired" it years ago from some packing inside industrial equipment I was installing, never know when you might need something!). This stuff worked wonders under my sub so thought it was worth a shot.

Quite impressed with results so far but be interesting to see what the v2 accomplish in between the Maggies and the maple blocks.
@geoffkait got snapshots of those springs. Sure would be nice if we could post pics. Things would be so much easier to comprehend.  I used the bike inner tubes under maple plywood bases for about a year. Once the component was placed on top of Barry's "economic" hip joints, some of the platforms were well balanced while others were a little lop-sided due to heavier innards more toward a side, the front or the back. Sliding off? For me none ever did.

No offence taken, perhaps because I don't know what you meant ;-) .

Say, are ya gonna tell us why the roller bearing is no good for isolating a turntable? I haven't come up with anything better than the spinning moving mass of the platter pulling the ball bearings in the direction it is spinning (clockwise).

I wouldn’t be quite so loose with how to employ my springs, no offense.

@uberwaltz and @elizabeth, the idea I came up with when I first saw Barry Diament's big Maggies on roller bearings, but transferred to my carpeted room and the pair of Tympani IVa I thought I would be able to shoehorn into that room (alas, that was not possible :-( ) was this:

Make a base plate out of Maple/Baltic Birch plywood/etc., and install three spikes in it to raise it off the carpet enough to make it stable (three is inherently stable, four a chore), and level it. Mount the Maggie feet/stand/base plate onto a similar piece of wood (may as well make it the same size as the one on the floor), and place the wood-mounted Maggie on top of the base plate/bottom piece of wood, with a trio of roller bearings between the two boards.

The same can be done with Geoff's springs, or even with both, using another board. Wood is cheap!

Somebody hasn’t been paying very close attention. I’ve already shared the secrets for the springs I use. Wake up and smell the coffee! ☕️

In looking at the diagram blowup of the GAIA on the IsoAcoustic website, I came to the conclusion that whatever isolation they are providing must be by way of some sort of rubber. They say it's not Sorbothane, but may it be Navcom? That stuff is still being made, and is used in firearms and other fields as mechanical dampers. I doubt it's the EAR rubber, but who knows?

I hope it's not, as the isolation properties of rubber doesn't extend very low in frequency, which is what we want. The lower the better. But remember when everyone ditched the springs in their VPI HW-19 tables for the SIMS Silencer Navcom pucks? Not all springs are created equal, and I don't think Geoff is going to share his secrets!

If I had the dough, I'd have a Herzan or Minus K under everything. Audiogoner folkfreak has his table on a Herzan (he had me over for a listen), and it's a thing of beauty! 

I would imagine damping would be more appropriate as well as less expensive for dipoles since speaker isolation is primarily used to prevent mechanical feedback. And dipoles don’t transmit much energy directly to the floor. It would probably be much more cost effective to isolate the front end.
@bdp24 

Thinking on I still have two 16x16 x2 maple blocks from previous speaker endeavors.
I could fasten the Maggie's existing feet to them and roller blocks then under that.
Right now they would be direct into carpet.

Would maybe try two sets of the v2 first
bdp24
The V.2 plus a set of Geoff’s springs would make a great budget isolation system. @geoffkait, how do you recommend your springs be partnered with roller bearings? I may just use my Symposium Jr’s, double cup style, therefore not having to be concerned about the LFT’s rolling off the bearings!

My “budget” springs having been outperforming high priced isolation systems for more than 20 years, and have been used in some of the most outstanding systems at CES including Mapleshade, the big Tenor Rockport system and two John Curl Bob Crump systems. My springs have gotten less expensive over the years as I learned how to simplify and evolve the design. Anybody can over-engineer spring-based isolation system. It’s not rocket science. 🚀 My springs have isolated Verdier turntables, 200 lb Flagship Classe amps, $30K high power BSW Consulting tube amps, Lamm tube amps, great big VPI turntables, Raven turntables, and many other high end systems. By going to a smaller high-performance spring I could dispense with everything else - the two plates, the dampers -and use only the spring. Make sense? Wasn’t it Einstein who said a thing should be made as simple as possible?
Post removed 

@uberwaltz, Barry Diament wrote that the roller bearings made more difference under his Maggie 20.7’s than under his electronics. But then he uses all solid state stuff, and records in digital. He uses the 20.7’s as monitors! You can see them on his website. He bolted the stock Maggie feet onto a 2’ square piece of plywood, then put a trio of bearings under the plywood. What I wonder is if he puts the bearing cups right on his carpeted floor, or on top of something else.

I have my Eminent Technology LFT-8b’s bolted onto Sound Anchor stands, which are a tripod design (inherently more stable than four feet, as found on loudspeaker outriggers). The SA’s come with spikes, but a set of roller bearings, GAIA’s, or Townshend Audio Seismic Pods can easily be substituted, which is what I intend to do. The Pods would run about $600, the GAIA II’s (good up to 120 lbs.) also $600 (they come in packs of four, so I would have two left for some other application), the Ingress V.2 only $140 if used single-cup style. The V.2 plus a set of Geoff’s springs would make a great budget isolation system. @geoffkait, how do you recommend your springs be partnered with roller bearings? I may just use my Symposium Jr’s, double cup style, therefore not having to be concerned about the LFT’s rolling off the bearings!


redlenses0
@geoffkait
am aware of the challenges of inner tube in both setup and performance as you eluded to - has to be just right and thus my reference to trying wave springs etc..just not sure what and where to get them yet, ideas?

>>>>I design high carbon heat tempered, cryo’d compression springs for moderate loads 25 to 70 lb and Super Stiff Springs for heavy loads, 75-200 lb. Both types of springs are suitable for placing directly under a component. Performance circa 2-3 Hz.

geoff kait
machina dynamica
vibration isolation and resonance control
@bdp24 
Have considered the Townsend products (would love to try them) especially the platforms for speakers but like you stated are costly.  

I do use the GAIA’s on my spkrs and although not super inexpensive, they do perform very well.  Priorities really and one has to pick where to focus $$.  Currently looking to upgrade DAC sooo...

I do do keep an eye out for their products used, but rarely come up, at least for my application and or timing. 

@geoffkait 
am aware of the challenges of inner tube in both setup and performance as you eluded to - has to be just right and thus my reference to trying wave springs etc..just not sure what and where to get them yet, ideas?  

Additionally, substitutes for marble that I currently use, especially for heavy monos (which I don’t for those and use a top and bottom cup with MDF due to their 90lb weight 
bdp24
redlenses03, if you want pneumatic isolation, and don’t mind spending a little money and time, you can keep your eyes open for the old Townshend Audio Seismic Sink platforms that were made in the 90’s-00’s. There were a few different versions, but they all shared the same basic design: an inner tube inside a top and bottom steel plate structure. The inner tube is inflated just enough to keep the top and bottom plates from touching; the lower the P.S.I., the lower the resonant frequency and the greater the isolation. A set of roller bearing on top of a Seismic Sink provides isolation is all planes.

>>>>>Actually there is what we call a design pressure for pneumatic iso stands, as it turns out the *ideal pressure psi* is not (rpt not) the minimum pressure psi, but something in between very low pressure and very high pressure. Otherwise the inner tube is too floppy and won’t act like a spring. You have to hunt for the ideal psi by ear. On my original single airspring Nimbus sub Hertz platform with 0.5 Hz performance the ideal pressure was around 30 psi for a load of 30 lb. For higher loads, the ideal pressure would go up, 🔝depends on the load. Also, inner tubes can’t provide effective isolation in the horizontal plane 🔛 or in any of the rotational directions. 🚁 since the inner tube is quite stiff in those directions. 

Inner tubes also have too much internal friction/damping for my taste and there’s the leaking problem as well.
@bdp24 

Do you think a pair of Maggie's would benefit from the Gaia isolation?

These things are light, about 20lb each and as you probably know sit on couple bent metal legs.

To be safe and stable i think you would need to drill and tap the metal legs to thread the Gaia into .

@redlenses03, if you want pneumatic isolation, and don’t mind spending a little money and time, you can keep your eyes open for the old Townshend Audio Seismic Sink platforms that were made in the 90’s-00’s. There were a few different versions, but they all shared the same basic design: an inner tube inside a top and bottom steel plate structure. The inner tube is inflated just enough to keep the top and bottom plates from touching; the lower the P.S.I., the lower the resonant frequency and the greater the isolation. A set of roller bearing on top of a Seismic Sink provides isolation is all planes.

Or, you can get the current Townshend Audio Seismic pods, but they’re around $100 each. Sets of Pods for a complete system can add up to quite a bit of money. But then two sets of the IsoAcoustic Gaia I’’s---enough for a pair of heavy loudspeakers---will cost you $1200, more than two sets of the Pods. The GAIA II is $600 for two sets, the GAIA III $400. Not too bad if you have light (under 70 lbs.) speakers.

It’s probably not that obvious but worth pointing out since inner tubes were just mentioned. The smoother and harder the surfaces are made for the roller bearing assemblies the more critical balance and level become, even if cups are used top and bottom, as I pointed out a couple posts down. Therefore, I humbly submit inner tubes are not (rpt not) a good choice for vertical isolation with roller bearings, or even used alone. Steel springs like you know who’s are a much better choice, not only because of the leakage issue but because inner tubes have a very non-ideal geometry for pneumatic isolation - the ideal geometry being tall and slender. I.e., large volume of air v per surface area in2. As I also just got through mentioning, there is some degree of vertical isolation with ONLY roller bearings and cups. Which reminds me, the reason some components can be mounted directly on bearings with no cups is probably because the hard roller bearings make slight depressions in the metal of the chassis base.
I too was part the earlier Barry discussions (on CA) on his hipjoints and had many offline conversations with. He is without a doubt one of the most gracious and pleasant individuals I have come across and has shared a wealth of info. Being relatively new to this hobby, this topic goes back even earlier on other forums and I think he bowed out as some indiv have an axe to grind with everything.

I purchased a set of ingress V1 when he first started out, and they were quality made, but the design didn’t follow the cup profile needed, so I outsourced a local shop to have them made (prob 25-30 qty) based on the larger 1" profile cut/6061. I put them under everything using the .5" marble slab for the smooth surface. Even speakers (at the time). I also use inner tube for the vertical, so its rack > inner tube > MDF > cup/bearings > marble > component. Works like a charm! Although with heavy speakers now, I opt’d for the GAIA’s

However, the inner tube does present some challenges one of which is maintaining their pressure. So I used a tube inlet extender which then gives you the ability to inflate/deflate without having to remove the components. I researched a ton on bladders (square ones like acoustic revive $$) and small inner tubes that are used on those small IC cars/toys etc.. but time is always a challenge and never took it farther then the bike inner tube..
These look to be great idea, but as usual in this hobby, ridiculous cost
http://pneuance.com/.
I would like to made two adjustments to my platforms:
1. Being the other challenge with inner tubes are getting the correct psi based on the component weight, its basically a guess (by eye) and putting just enough air that the tube isn’t grounding out on the platform. To that end I would like to try some wave washer/comp springs instead of inner tubes and just started looking/researching. Since you can then design around the max load per spring, it should be easier..
2. Replacing the marble with say a .25" plate of alum and then maybe some cork or wood on top. The marble works but the heavier components give me pause and would feel better with a more structurally sound formula.  Something like the symposium segue platforms come to mind, but not sure if that would be too compliant and would need about 5 so that is costly
I's still waiting for the same responses I got when I brought up Ingress Audio on another thread some time ago. A couple of posters claimed whatever sat on the bearings would roll right off and couldn't believe it would work.
I believe I was one of those posters Nonoise.
But it was not that I claimed they would roll right off , more I was having trouble in my mind seeing just what there was that would STOP the amp rolling right off very easily.

But at $70 I was willing to give it a try and nope it did not move a mm once sat down on top of all three so mind put at rest.

You do not know what you do not know......
The physics of roller bearings, pt 2.

If the base of the roller bearing assembly is flat there can be only rotational isolation in the twist direction. 🕺🏻 Plus isolation in the horizontal x-z plane. You lose the isolation in the roll and rock directions. It is the rotational seismic forces that try to rotate the building and everything inside. If the base is concave the component is isolated in those two rotational directions. The smoother and harder the surfaces of the bass and base the easier the component will move when acted on by any external forces. Which means the whole roller bearing set up can easily get “stuck” when the balls roll to the edge of the base if the set up is not perfectly level and balanced. That condition limits the iso device’s isolation, since it cannot move further in that direction. Isolation effectiveness in a given direction is proportional to how easily the component can move in that direction.

Another advantage of a concave surface for the base is that when the component rotates slightly due to rotational forces, there is some degree of vertical isolation since the component moves up and down vertically 🔝 as it rocks and rolls, no? Up and down as it rotates around its centerline axis. Recall wave passing under boat analogy.

You can buy miniature 2” shallow ceramic bowls on line that might work very well and a glass marble of the appropriate size, one bowl on top and one on the bottom. Total cost for set of three roller bearing assemblies $30.
glupson
"Pop quiz

Can anyone think of a reason roller bearings might not be a good idea under a turntable?"
It would roll of the shelf.

>>>>>>>There’s one in every crowd.

So true @uberwaltz. For not much $, one can substitute harder, smoother tungsten carbide ball bearings for the stock steel balls. Symposium charges a small fortune for them, but they are available from ball bearing vendors for far cheaper.

By the way, whether or not anyone thinks the original Ingress was a "knock-off" of the Symposium Roller Block Jr., Symposium was in 1997 granted a patent for the "double-stack" design used in both bearings.

"Pop quiz 

Can anyone think of a reason roller bearings might not be a good idea under a turntable?"
It would roll of the shelf.

What prize did I win?