Increase tonearm mass to match low compliance cart

Binar, there have been many posts concerning the 103R's advertised compliance. Most believe it is higher though still a LOMC. I've used the 103r with a RB250 and RB300 with great results. You should be just fine without doing anything special.

I do recommend looking up TWL's tweak which uses some fishing weights as a means to improve stability of the Rega arms. Very cheap but very effective tweak.

Thanks,Dan ed

I've learned a little more about this issue.
The RB250 has an effective mass of 11g, the
DL-103R weighs 8.5 and has a compliance of 5cu.

So, the resonant frequency of this combo according
to the formula I've found is 16.1 Hz, which is
out of the safe range of 9-14 Hz.

Wonder if that 2 Hz will make a audible difference,
even if subtle or indirect? I'd need to increase
tonearm mass by 7g to get into the window.

In deference to the assurance of Dan_ed, I wonder
what the best way to add a quarter ounce to my
cart/arm is? A metal shim? Brass bolts?

Do not read too much into Denon's compliance number. If you do a search at Vinyl Asylum, there is a general concensus there that Denon's number is not particularly accurate and that the real compliance number is closer to 9cu. A member there has measured the reasonant frequency of his 103R in a 10.5g SME V to be just under 9 and many people feel that the Denon works well in many medium mass arms as well as those with higher mass.

Try it as it is and see how you make out. If you feel compelled with adding mass to your arm, I'd suggest using blu tak on top of the headshell and not adding more than about 3-4 grams to start off with.