Immersive Audio and How to Achieve It


100% of music listeners prefer live music to recorded playback, why? A live performance "immerses" you and frees you up to move around the room, the dance floor and still be immersed. The goal posts have moved away from two speakers to an array of speakers all around as well as above you to reproduce the illusion of a LIVE performance. Why, in 2023, would anyone voluntarily use only two speakers to recreate this illusion of a live performance in a large room?

Even the artists themselves are using immersive audio in concert to WOW their audience, why not do it at home:

https://www.mixonline.com/live-sound/venues/on-the-cover-las-vegas-takes-immersive-live-part-1

 

kota1

Showing 1 response by drmuso

kota1

... A live performance "immerses" you and frees you up to move around the room, the dance floor and still be immersed ...

Your statement reveals you have very limited experience with live music performances. You might be surprised to learn that many of the sonically best music venues have no dance floor at all.

I agree with cleed’s response above.

I don’t necessarily prefer a live performance, especially if the sound system sucks or I have a bad seat. If the sound system is monophonic, I’d rather hear a good stereo recording of that performance.

With a good stereo recording with natural ambience, my system can reproduce three dimensions of the performance, and that’s "immersive" enough for a lot of music. However, I do enjoy having sounds come from various directions, whether it’s through a multichannel system or creative use of out-of-phase sounds, like Eddie Kramer employed on Electric Ladyland. Also, getting immersed in music may depend as much on the listener’s state of mind as it does on the gear.