There is almost 0 data loss in wired home networks. Even when there is, those data failures are corrected. The only issues come does to EMI, whether through the Ether cable, which is possible as Ethernet transformer can pass somewhat low frequencies, or possibly through closely connected power supplies.
If you stream music from the internet, I can't recommend this more highly
Showing 12 responses by audio2design
Great example of a person who is not smart when it comes to technology so they open up their wallet willy nilly and believe anything they are told. There is almost 0 data loss in wired home networks. Even when there is, those data failures are corrected. The only issues come does to EMI, whether through the Ether cable, which is possible as Ethernet transformer can pass somewhat low frequencies, or possibly through closely connected power supplies. |
If you want to understand a TON of information about digital streaming that few people understand, check out The Hans Beekhuyzen channel on YouTube. Yes, the 70's era scope in the background must mean he knows what he is talking about. That is why he is hyping superlatives on a product that ASR showed, with the stock power supply, was an absolute disaster. |
If you're sending data via packets there is no need for reclocking with any somewhat confidently designed DAC. The dock generates its own local clock it gains no clocking information from the data connection. Much of the claims for the so-called Network reclockers assumes that the person who did the dac is totally incompetent. The claims that they make would be instantly evident and easily tested with a distortion plus noise across frequency plot. If they can't provide you clear evidence of that sort then that's all they have is claims they don't have any evidence their product does anything. |
Copied this from a website, but ... Breaking Down the Evidence The main concern with empirical research is the collection of unbiased evidence. Researchers must carefully design the research while minimizing exposure to potential errors. In the scientific world, it is common that several scientists or researchers gather evidence simultaneously through the replication of the same study. In addition, a peer review is a primary tool in science that is used to validate the evidence provided in a study or research. https://corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/knowledge/other/empirical-evidence/ Stolen from Wikipedia. These methods yield only probabilities. Among scientific researchers, empirical evidence (as distinct from empirical research) refers to objective evidence that appears the same regardless of the observer. For example, a thermometer will not display different temperatures for each individual who observes it. Temperature, as measured by an accurate, well calibrated thermometer, is empirical evidence. By contrast, non-empirical evidence is subjective, depending on the observer. Following the previous example, observer A might truthfully report that a room is warm, while observer B might truthfully report that the same room is cool, though both observe the same reading on the thermometer. The use of empirical evidence negates this effect of personal (i.e., subjective) experience or time. What this means is the answer to "do you like A better than B" could be considered non-empirical evidence. Being able to tell A and B apart would be empirical evidence. However, if B was a modified version of A, then it could be empirical depending on how the question was worded. I do feel this paragraph is a bit strict in its definition. From bennpar.com Anecdotal evidence is using your personal experiences and stories to illustrate your point. Empirical evidence is measured, unbiased, and replicable.
From study.com Today's topic, anecdotal evidence, can be defined as testimony that something is true, false, related, or unrelated based on isolated examples of someone's personal experience. Anecdotal evidence is very popular in the advertising world. Every time you see a claim about a product's effectiveness based on a person's personal experience, the company is using anecdotal evidence to encourage sales. Again, like almost every single uncontrolled listening test reported on Audiogon. From yourdictionary.com Based on casual observations or indications rather than rigorous or scientific analysis. Again, like almost every reported listening test here. Oxford English Dictionary:
So yes, I am quite confident in classifying almost all the reported listening experiences on this site as anecdotal. |