If you don't have a wide sweet spot, are you really an audiophile?


Hi, it’s me, professional audio troll. I’ve been thinking about something as my new home listening room comes together:

The glory of having a wide sweet spot.

We focus far too much on the dentist chair type of listener experience. A sound which is truly superb only in one location. Then we try to optimize everything exactly in that virtual shoebox we keep our heads in. How many of us look for and optimize our listening experience to have a wide sweet spot instead?

I am reminded of listening to the Magico S1 Mk II speakers. While not flawless one thing they do exceptionally well is, in a good room, provide a very good, stable stereo image across almost any reasonable listening location. Revel’s also do this. There’s no sudden feeling of the image clicking when you are exactly equidistant from the two speakers. The image is good and very stable. Even directly in front of one speaker you can still get a sense of what is in the center and opposite sides. You don’t really notice a loss of focus when off axis like you can in so many setups.

Compare and contrast this with the opposite extreme, Sanders' ESL’s, which are OK off axis but when you are sitting in the right spot you suddenly feel like you are wearing headphones. The situation is very binary. You are either in the sweet spot or you are not.

From now on I’m declaring that I’m going all-in on wide-sweet spot listening. Being able to relax on one side of the couch or another, or meander around the house while enjoying great sounding music is a luxury we should all attempt to recreate.
erik_squires

Showing 12 responses by tomic601

I wonder why KEF chose to time align and phase correct the amplified LS-50 ?
I am guessing they too are aiming..... low.
and you obviously have never figured out where those “ quiet “ tympani are......you spend wayyyyyyy to much time in multi track land.....like i said, flavors you or the producer like....it ain’t moving the ball forward....cat chasing its own tail....
i would buy a Fred T speaker......but....there don’t seem to be any...of consequence.... please do correct me if i err....
and we also have Apogee, Quad ESL 63, Jim Thiel, etc..... better bring a six pack....
imaging champions is I believe the quote, you are welcome to build something better and bring the over to Poverty Bay Sound mastering, we use Vandersteens, the amps and 7 mk2. bring the torso along, i assume it likes a nice Pinot. We serve SeaSmoke Ten. of course i have a head transfer function setup, like the Acony recordings, it yields fantastic and frustrating results....

like i said, get off the web and do something.....i will eat crow when you best Vandersteens, but ya best show up with real hardware..not BS
also, let’s be very clear, your credentials relative to Vandersteen are zip. Since 1977 building time and phase correct speakers that are well reviewed AND widely accepted in the global market. Quarter million model 2 sold and an improved variant still in production, supported by a dealer network, factory parts and service.

go build something., record something, .....
the problem w time and phase and the very related pistonic motion is that it is difficult engineering and requires precise execution, few can do it, take the time to do it. 

the ear brain can localize to stay alive, a few years of television, bad audio and know it all’s on the web can’t erase x years of evolution.

for those interested in what just a few well placed microphones can do, listen to the classic RCA Red Seal work done w Fritz and Chicago.....
pretty much all my field recordings are simple two microphone gigs, piano the exception. Multi track in the studio, well those are not references, just flavors we like. i am not going to play your argument game, too many neat acoustic musical events to enjoy in reverberant space.....