How will XLR cables vs RCA effect a phono pre


I have an TNT V with SME IV type 6 tonearm with a Sumiko Sho cartridge that is a high output at 47K ohms and the output voltage is 2.3 mV. I have had to move my turntable so the cable going to ARPH3SE is one meter, but the cable going to Krell Pre-Amp needs to be 2m. If I were to upgrade to another phono pre-amp, would I be better off looking for one with XLR connections? I notice that there are not a lot of phono-pre that have XLR. Why is this? Would I be better off with a battery pre that seems to be very quiet or bite the bullet and look at BAT or similar? Can someone explain the difference between using RCA or XLR cables on a turntable and phono pre-amp? Any help greatly appreciated.
adorfman

Showing 3 responses by atmasphere

Using a phono cartridge as a balanced source is something that was first done by Atma-Sphere, in 1989 with the MP-1 preamplifier, which also has a fully differential phono section.

You do *not* get more gain with the cable- you get less noise, and less artifact from the cable itself.
Noise is always an issue in phono reproduction. Anything you can do to reduce it is helpful, as long as those techniques do not introduce other problems.

Balanced operation is on of those techniques that works. You get reduced noise in 2 ways:
1) reduced noise from the cable and its routing
2) reduced noise from the phono section.

Differential gain stages have theoretically 6db less noise than the equivalent circuit operated single-ended, after you have accounted for gain differences. The noise of any phono section is compounded from gain stage to gain stage; so if the phono section is fully differential from input to output the reduced amount of noise can be substantial- perhaps 12 or 18 db in theory.

In fact in practice the actual reduction in noise is less, but only by a db or so if you have good design. This phenomena is so pronounced that in our phono section we are able to get sufficient gain with only 2 gain stages- despite the fact that our EQ is passive. With less gain stages there is less places for things to go wrong.

The fact of the matter is that going balanced, fully balanced, offers a very nice upgrade to phono performance. If the preamp is not balanced then IMO there is only marginal advantage to using a balanced cable.
Hi Undertow, you do **not** have to modify the tone arm. Most arms are already set up as balanced sources, even the lowly BSRs, Garrards and Duals of yesteryear.

You do have to jump through some hurdles with the air-bearing straight tracking arms, as they have so many lateral tracking mass problems that the designers usually eliminate the 5th wire that is common to all other arms.

The 5th wire is the ground, and is why the arm needs no mods.

The cartridge outputs are the twisted pair that runs inside the balanced line. The 5th wire, ground, is the shield of the cable, and ties to pin 1 of the XLR. So the shields of the cables are both tied to the same point at the arm end of the cable (ground).

Note that in this hookup scenario, there is no signal on the shield. So the arm itself shields the signal from the cartridge, and once through the bearing system, the interconnect cable takes over the shielding from there.

If the cable passes through a noise source, the noise will be impinged on both plus and minus signals in the same way, and rejected once arriving at the preamp input. In this way noise is reduced. In a single-ended system this noise would be amplified by the phono preamp.