How an audio rack can enhance your amp/pre




Just thought I would share my recent experience with upgrading my sound star technologies rack to the new rhythm rack.

Every now and then, I have a visiting audiophile who really appreciates my system…and traditionally asks – “wow, what makes it sound so good?” My typical answer is it all makes a difference, even down the equipment rack, which can and certainly should be considered a component…but in many cases is overlooked…

Star Sound introduction

About 10 years ago, I was introduced to Star Sound Technologies Sistrum platforms and Audio Points. Audiopoints has always been known for its manufacture of well-designed and beautifully manufactured brass cones used under equipment and as an integral part of an audio stand. This ultimately led to the design of stands designed to transfer vibrations out of components and down to ground. What I didn’t know at the time was how good the Sistrum platforms ‘sounded’. So, I bit the bullet and tried several Sistrum Platforms - what intrigued me about the stands was the design of the Sistrum Platform which allowed a pre-determined pattern of energy, known as Coulomb Friction to develop and dissipate via a high-speed calculated conductive pathway to earth's ground. Which made sense…how do you deal with airborne energy dissipation? I know you could put cones to reduce vibrations from the ‘ground up’ so to speak, but how could you eliminate airborne vibration? We’ve all held our hand on our equipment when music is playing only to feel the equipment vibrate, so how do you deal with it? Draining it quickly to ground made sense, but at the end of the day, all I really wanted to know was…does it improve the sound?

To say I was shocked is an understatement - the Original Sistrum Platforms offered – smoother sound, better transients, dynamics and a lower noise floor. And, the cool part is that you could turn up the sound and the music would flow with greater ease…well worth the investment. Robert at Star Sound was extremely helpful in guiding me through which racks made the most sense for my system.

Rhythm Platforms

Which brings me to 2015…it had been a while since I last spoke with Robert curious as to what his engineering team was up to…which led me to check out the ‘new’ model of Sistrum Stands – the Sistrum Rhythm Platforms.

These new platforms / shelves were substantially heavier, with a nicer overall finish than the original stands, with more grooves allowing for substantially more options to place points in various places under your equipment to refine the sound even further. In addition, the shelves were engineered to deal with resonances in a more efficient manner…The brass cones at the bottom of the rack were substantially bigger in size - 3 inches and quite heavy. The brass cones under the equipment were attached with nicely crafted screws that could be hand tightened and no longer required a screw driver… a nice feature making it both easier to put together but also the amount of tightening could influence the sound. The brass and platform rods are modular, making it easier to put together and painted in a beautiful black finish – in combination with the brass I would say the improvement in the WAF factor is significant – the stands are really impressive to look at. As for structure, these things were a solid as could be – and heavy! Not going anywhere, even in an earthquake!

My system includes VAC equipment, preamp, amps, DAC and a transport. As well as power supplies. Most of which now rested on the new Rhythm Platform.

Listening Impressions:

My first impressions were clearly a lower noise floor with enhanced dynamics, while also being able to hear deeper into the soundstage, which now extended well outside of the speakers. Tempo was faster, due to better-defined, leading edges. The high end was ‘cleaner’, with more sheen and decay on symbols and hi hats. Brass had that right bite to it, without over doing it…Bass lines were tighter which led to better ‘rhythm’ … and best of all, I could crank up the volume and the dynamic range seemed to extend effortlessly, which was a nice surprise.

One thing I noticed, that was true of my initial experience with Sistrum Platforms, is that the newer Rhythm Platforms sounded progressively better after 3 days of ‘settling’ and reached full potential after about 1 week. So some form of break in is required.
Over the years, I’ve tried different racks and various cones under equipment, whether if be soft, hard, ceramic, rubber (or some variation of ‘absorbing material’ etc.) you name it. All of which ‘altered’ the sound, but nothing came close to the Sistrum Stands holistically; while the new Rhythm stands, just take it all to a higher level…
While I cannot expound eloquently on science of Coulomb’s Friction, I can tell you that whatever they are doing at Star Sound visa vie their racks, it works…and it’s not subtle. This is a very audible improvement in your listening experience. If you want your system to perform at its highest level, I would suggest that you maximize your investment in your equipment by letting it do what it does best and put it on a Sistrum rack that will allow it to perform at its best. And if you want the best, I would strongly recommend the Rhythm Platforms.
wisper

Showing 19 responses by charles1dad

I use the original Star Sound sistrum stands beneath my mono block amplifiers and their Apprentice platforms beneath all other components and speakers. Their effect is splendid and truly improve the sound quality. I consider them mandatory in my system. They are exceptionally cost effective IMO.
Charles,
Schubert,
I will say that Herbie's were the exception to the rule, they are the best of the soft compound products in my system (by a wide margin). They were out performed by the Star Sound Audio Points regardless of the components compared. I could confidently recommend Herbie's as an example of a good soft material product. The Apprentice platforms move you into a higher realm of sound quality.
Charles,
Tbg,
I have also heard tales of Agear's room as well, urban myth or reality? 3 years and still no pictures😊.
Charles
Roxy54,
I agree that no one is being attacked, we all have our differences based on listening experiences. In my case I've used sorbethane/soft compound products and also Star Sound brass points and then their Apprentice platforms. No comparison in my system, the soft material products were clearly inferior. Two very different tiers of sound quality quite honestly. No doubt however that opinions/outcomes will vary.For me it was an easy distinction to hear.
Charles,
Textreme,
Yes, this audio endeavor is overwhelmingly subjective in nature and I just assume an open forum such as this will reflect that point. We can only report our personal impression/experiences and recognize there will contrary opinion.
Charles,
Maril555,
I don't doubt your listening impressions via Star Sound products, you heard what you heard in your system. I'm unaware of any product regardless of review/reputation that has achieved 100% consensus/agreement, never happens. Too many system and listener variables to contend with.

There was a thread on this site in the past where Still Points and Star Sound were compared. Although the majority who tried both preferred SS, some preferred SP, THIS MAKES SENSE TO ME. I haven't experienced the tonal problems you encountered, different ears,room,componrnts etc.The best one can do is try a product for themselves and listen to it in their system. Outcomes will vary as expected.
Charles,
Maril555,
I would have a hard time saying that any audio product is devoid of some level of sonic signature. I do understand and appreciate your experience and impressions. All I can say is is that in regards to my system and individual components the Starsound products have been a significant plus across the board, tonality has been improved in my opinion not hindered. The natural tonal richness and harmonic overtones were revealed in their complexity and beauty. I have little tolerance for added brightness, I do seek improved openness and transparency and this is what I have found with these products. Sometimes equally experienced listeners will simply have different
outcomes and sonic impressions in their respective systems. If I heard the same brightness that you described, I would have quickly gotten rid of these products.
Regards,
Charles,
Nice examples Andrew. All three of those brands employ different approaches as you clearly point out. Each one certainly has their camp of strong/loyal advocates. At one time I came close to buying the SRA product(never heard it). It may have worked very well in my system(who knows?). I'm very happy with the Star Sound approach.
I suspect the builder and designer of the SRA poducts would not have imagined someone actually cutting the expensive product in half, interesting findings to say the least.
Hi Wolf,,
You have stated that you have worked quite frequently with jazz musicians and I'm a deep admirer of that genre of music. I'd be very grateful if you could direct me to some CD jazz recordings that you have engineered. I'd love to hear some of them.
Thanks,
Charles,
Tbg,
We have a few system products in common. I use the Tripoint Troy MK II and a High Fidelity CT 1U Digital cable with much satisfaction. I'm very happy with the SS Apprentice platforms as well. So I find you enthusiasm for the SS Rhythm platform very intriguing. They're a lot more expensive so if I were to buy them I'd likely begin with them beneath the speakers. Well something to think about.
Charles,
Hi Tbg,
Just to be clear I'm in no way disappointed with the Apprentice. I've long acknowledged that regardless of what you currently own there's always something better. My comments were to express relative to the Apprentice platforms that the Rhythm must be something quite special. Believe me I have no new found dissatisfaction with what the Apprentices have added to my system.
Charles,
Agear,
Regarding Wolf Garcia I really wanted to hear his work and perhaps discover some jazz artists unfamiliar to me. I just have to assumed he has his reasons for not providing some recordings to share with genuinely interested folks here.
Charles,
Okay Wolf,
I understand now, live venue work rather than studio sound recording as an engineer. I was very curious to hear your finished product (recordings).
I don't know what particular "spikes" Art was referencing. Over the years I've use a variety of spikes and cones. The brass Audio Points were in a different class of sound quality, just plain better. I believe that the quality of material, manufacturing and engineering is what distinguishes one product from another. They can't all be grouped together as if they are all the same.
Charles,
T ramey,
Star Sound is a no nonsense high quality company. I'm glad the Rhythm platforms worked out so well in your system.
Andrew,
Have you discussed with Robert the differences between the Rhythm and Backstage as platforms for your speakers?
I haven't spoken to Robert in some time but I know he's quite proud of the Backstage as a supreme product. Perhaps the Rhythm comes close for less money. I suspect both are terrific platforms.
Charles,
Hi John (Roxy54),
I've found Robert to be very candid about his product's hierarchy. I was very pleased with using their basic brass Audio Points. He said the Apprentice is a clear step upwards and he was right. I believe it simply becomes a matter of individual cost ceiling/budget restraint. Given Robert's track record, I suspect the Rhythm and Backstage are that good. I'm very happy with the Apprentice, so I don't lust after the higher tier platforms at this time. I don't doubt their quality.
Charles,
John,
Sorry about my response to you. I thought your comment" he's a fan of too many things" was in reference to Robert of Star Sound rather than C. Perry. My apology.