I think there are probaably people on this board who think so.
Sure is a small sub-culture here, and most of us probably do not have friends in this hobby, but i get the feeling that some people get a real nice feeling when they finally get to enter "Krell" or "Mark Levinson" into thier virtual systems.
Im also sure that there are are people here who gain a sence of validity when they aquire something that is coveted, or expected and not yet owned.
I will be the first to say i use a reciever, and i want to go to a amp/pre-amp setup, however, I have also seen instances here and there (not often) where people look slightly down upon others for having inferior equipment, as if by default, the fact that they might have lesser quality equipment reduces thier credibility, and they must not know much about this.
Or,
the other way, someone with inferior equipment might look up to other folks because they do have the equipment that they desire. And might base thier decisions upon the advise of those who own the nicer stuff, when in all actuallity, they could actually be a overly rich, self richeous pompus idiot, who does not know his ass from a sine wave.
I for example still have the reciever. But due to my profession i understand more about electronics and sound than a good majority of people on this site. (Im not trying to brag, there are plenty of people who know more than me as well)
While i am sure most people here on the 'gon' are only interested in having the quality that comes with it, i still think there is something satisfying about listing some Watt Puppys on the virtual system.
I think in a way, in this own subculture, that certain brand names offer credibility, which can also be considered a status symbol.
I dont see anything wrong with it. But if Norh is as good as it claims, then why do people bother with amplifiers in the sub $2000.00 price range? I think the name sometimes has something to do with it
IMHO, 2C
