To me, the list is a subset of the groundbreaking literary work by J. Gordon Holt starting in 1962 in Stereophile and summarized in Sounds Like? A Audio Glossary, Jul 29, 1993 and Harry Pearson starting in 1973 and summarized in How to Readthe Absolute Sound, for which I do not remember the formal reference. Yes this podcast addresses key points of audiophile sound and simplification is not a bad thing for some, not for me. I may disagree with you George (@ghdprentice) in that I miss the list of esoteric stuff and artistic descriptives of the many aspects of sound from the “old” days of those publications that challenged and stimulated my mind to understand the sound of a system or equipment from the reviewers perspective. I understood what Mr. Pearson ment by a chocolatey sound. I find the current reviews sterile, without passion, and tamed by the hand of legal review in our now more litigious society, making it more difficult to ascertain the sound from the reviewers perspective. I agree with @steakster in that the list misses the attributes of audiophile sound most important to me … timbre … for without timbral accuracy it cannot approach the sound of real music, and is that the point of the hobby. So again I have been too verbose in expressing the fact that this simple list is too simple.