Has anyone switched from Class AB/A to Class D? Was it better? Was it worse?


I heard a class D amp the other day (Lyngdorf) and it sounded really good. I liked the minimalism of it also. But, I need to own a amp for a couple of months to really know if I like it or not. I don't like room correction ether, so I just liked the sound without that. 

Curious, has anyone ever switched from a class AB or class A amp to a class D amp? If so, did you regret it? Was it a downgrade in sound? Or was it upgrade in sound? 

 

dman777

Showing 1 response by jhw9

I like and have kept both. I’ve got a vintage Class A Pass Aleph3 (driven direct from a Wyred DAC2DSD) and ICE-based Wyred SX500 mono’s paired with a highly modified Rogue Metis (running Tung Sol VT99’s via adapters). The Aleph3 has an intimate continuity in image depth.. magical midrange while the Wyred’s (paired w my specific pre) have finesse and LF control while painting a detailed but natural cinematic stereo image. One is great for colder months and the other for summer and fall. I have tried the SX500’s driven direct from the DAC2DSD and thought it was nearly unlistenable, however. The right tube pre can have a way of ’sorting out’ older (but w well implemented output stage) class D topology into something that can still work now. The Rogue Metis Magnum is fairly dynamic (and a tube-roller’s dream/nightmare as an unbuffered tube design), but definitely a bit rough in stock form with stock tubes. I’ve got a good dozen other boxes in another room of other good-value separates; tube, Class D, and Class A, Class A/B, but these are the two setups I still use.. and I still go to shows. If I had money burning a hole in my pocket I’d like to try a Riviera Levante, Linnenberg or Kinki Mono’s.. a Nagra Classic amp.. perhaps some AGD Duets. I’d also like to try a Perla S50 integrated some day.. which I’ve heard with two way monitors before.

it’s more system synergy and implementation of the topology than topology, imho.