I have listened to both at an average acoustic venue (dealer) driving Salons. I also listened to both driving the Genesis V (the main spkr of course, not the subwoof). Finally, let me say that although I admire the Salons, for some strange reason I never managed to get to like their sound... BTW I listen to and judge by classical music and a bit of blues.
SO: with the Genesis, the Halcro was better (harmonic texture, detail, upper register, voice/violin/cello). The Lev sounded darker.
With the Salons: tough choice. The 33 sounded superb and so did the Halcro. I'd say the Halcro was better in the upper mids onward (say +3-4kHz) making the sound slightly more alive. I could say the Levs had the edge lower mids-bass. Dynamic swings were excellent, esp with the Levs.
Note that when I say "better" I mean very SLIGHTLY superior to MY ears -- for you that should mean "possibly" or "probably".
Final considerations: Revel & MLev were "related" products, so it may be that ML were used in voicing the Salons. IMO the 33's are by far the best ML product BUT, as always, YMMV!
SO: with the Genesis, the Halcro was better (harmonic texture, detail, upper register, voice/violin/cello). The Lev sounded darker.
With the Salons: tough choice. The 33 sounded superb and so did the Halcro. I'd say the Halcro was better in the upper mids onward (say +3-4kHz) making the sound slightly more alive. I could say the Levs had the edge lower mids-bass. Dynamic swings were excellent, esp with the Levs.
Note that when I say "better" I mean very SLIGHTLY superior to MY ears -- for you that should mean "possibly" or "probably".
Final considerations: Revel & MLev were "related" products, so it may be that ML were used in voicing the Salons. IMO the 33's are by far the best ML product BUT, as always, YMMV!