Gimbal vs unipivot tonearms

No issues, billwojo. Just experienced enough to know every connection is a discontinuity, and a weakness. In fact if you read my post again it is about connections.

As for me, the one thing I have learned over the years is the fewer connections the better.

Tone arms happen to be the example we are talking about, but there’s a reason I worded it the way I did: the fewer the connections the better applies to everything.

There is simply no getting around it. Now at this point I could say it sounds like you have had some issues with sound quality getting in the way of convenience. But I won’t.

Exactly. Tone arms are like everything else all down to how well an innumerable list of details is executed. Really good tone arms can be made from all sorts of different designs. There are examples of terrific arms made using wood, carbon fiber, aluminum alloy, pivoted, linear tracking, short arm, long arm, on and on. And on.   

The most useful thing you can learn sokogear is if you can pick up a sense of how to judge the value of all these different approaches. As for me, the one thing I have learned over the years is the fewer connections the better. So of all the different tone arm design approaches the one I care the most about is that the phono leads be hard wired. I will consider all kinds of arms but never again one that I also have to buy a phono interconnect for.  

You can take that however you like but all it means to me is all these other things people go on about- mass, compliance, length, etc, etc- they can all be done any which way and still sound good. But if at the end of the day you add all those extra connections you wind up shooting yourself in the foot.

As usual, it's all about the implementation, not the technology itself.

Correct: The Devil's in the details.

The devil's in the details.