Finite Elemente Ceraball vs Nordost Pulsar Point


Has anyone compared the Ceraball to the Pulsar Point? Which is a more efficient product in supporting components on a Finite Elemente Spider rack?

Any advice would be appreciated.
ryder

Showing 1 response by ryder

Thanks for the response. I have bought the FE Spider rack and will explore the Ceraballs in due time. I agree on the advantages of proper rigid platforms(or proper rack system) over cones and spikes. However, some platforms and/or racks are designed to be used with their own tuning devices, the Ceraball Spider on the Spider rack for instance.

Cheers.