filter set up in esoteric sa-50


Hope this is right place for the discussion, with my esoteric sa-50, I get what upsampling does, in x2 and x4, and also FIR filter makes the sound richer(for me more engaging), and the other more resoluted, but what about DSD?
I know it's down to personal taste but with some CDs i have hard time distinguishing the difference between x4 upsampling and DSD, with some CDs, DSD makes the sound more 3D, What is the real effect DSD does to the sound? And what filter do you use for what kind of music? i.e i generally use FIR filter mostly for Jazz and upbeat stuff.
karmatogdral
I prefer up sampling CD's to DSD with my SA-50. There is mostly subtle differences but in my system I could finally discern some quick transients that I could never quite figure what the sounds were (two quick piano notes). To me it is more fluid and 3D, less glare. The FIR or S-DLY filters are not used when going to DSD.
" I know it's down to personal taste "

You are absolutely right. Everybody is different. I clearly heard artifacts when upsampled Red Book or transfer it to DSD. Thus I kept it original. Filter I prefered was Short-Delay (may be less warm, ite true....but more authentic to acoustic music).

" i have hard time distinguishing the difference between x4 upsampling and DSD" If so then it does not matter, trow coin. I preferred to keep DSD as DSD.

When Alex Peychev from APL HiFi heard my unit he agreed with me 100% but installed his own DAC (insted of Esoteric) where everything was upsampled x4... (and output stage and his own clockd etc) and after very long break-in I love Alex work.

" I prefer up sampling CD's to DSD with my SA-50"

This is exactly what Stereophile reviewer done. He described every combination in smallest details except most trivial choice - keep CD sound original.

Everybody is different, I quess