Evolving from a avr to an av processor. Benefit?


After upgrading to a great McIntosh multi ch amp and hi end speakers, I am considering upgrading a marantz avr to an av processor.  
Been told the avr is a weak link and there would be improvement in sound clarity, separation, etc. and maybe there would be.  Curious if others have seen discernible value when replacing an avr with an av processor.
All about feeling better about your components and trying to discern real value in making a hopefully near final step to a major upgrade cycle in home theater system.  
emergingsoul

Showing 1 response by big_greg

An AVR's amps are typically not very powerful (WPC specifications are usually for 1 or 2 channels driven, with a significant drop when multiple channels are driven), which means less dynamics and actual power to your speakers.

Technology is rapidly changing, so your AVR/preamp will become obsolete a lot faster than your amp.  Being able to keep a nice amp and upgrade just the processor section if there's some new feature you want/need is nice.  I think this is the 3rd processor I've used with my current 5 channel home theater amp.

To get the best of both worlds, consider an audio only preamp that has a home theater bypass option.  This setup can provide a much better two channel listening experience than using a home theater receiver or processor plus amp. 

Whether you have a receiver or separate amp home theater processor setup, there's a lot of crap packed into either one of those units, mostly cheap circuit boards and not much room for high quality parts.  Lots of compromise and a focus towards a kitchen sink of features, as opposed to a focus on sound quality.